Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
A. J. DESAI, BIREN VAISHNAV
Image Mine Products Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mercuria Energy Trading Pte Ltd. – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
A.J.DESAI, J.
(1) By way of present Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, the appellant - original respondent has challenged an oral judgment dated 29.04.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in the captioned writ petition, by which the learned Single Judge has accepted the petition filed by the present respondent by holding that High Court of Gujarat has jurisdiction to execute the foreign award dated 26.04.2016 passed by the learned London Court of International Arbitration (hereinafter referred to as ‘the LCIA’ for short), under section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
(2) The Appeal came to be admitted on 05.07.2022. In response to the notice issued by this Court, the respondent has appeared and contested the Appeal. The matter is taken up for final hearing today.
(3) The short facts emerged from the records are as under : -
(3.1) That the parties to the present proceedings entered into a contr
The main legal point established in the judgment is that only the High Court of Gujarat has jurisdiction to execute a foreign award under section 47 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and....
The enforcement of an arbitral award can be initiated anywhere in the country where the decree can be executed, without requiring a transfer of decree from the court with jurisdiction over the arbitr....
The seat of arbitration determines jurisdiction for enforcement of awards, allowing execution within that jurisdiction despite asset relocations, emphasizing the need for transparency in asset disclo....
The main legal point established is that the Commercial Court has jurisdiction to entertain execution proceedings arising from an award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and the award holde....
The determination of the arbitration 'seat' and 'venue' is critical; if the 'venue' does not specify a 'seat', jurisdiction lies with the designated court under the arbitration agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article