Back
N. V. ANJARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
Inox Ceramics – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle (1)(1) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.V.ANJARIA, J.
All these Special Civil Applications seeking to challenge the notices issued for re-opening of the assessment for the assessment years concerned under Section 148 and the orders passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
1.1 The petitions involve similar facts and identical issues, therefore, they were heard together to be treated for disposal by this common judgment and order.
1.2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, having regard to the issues involved and with consent and request of learned advocates for the parties, all these Special Civil Applications were taken up for final consideration today.
2. Rule returnable in each of the Special Civil Applications forthwith. Learned advocate Mrs.Kalpna Raval for the respondent Revenue waives service of Rule in all.
2.1 Heard learned advocate Mr.Darshan Patel for the petitioners and learned advocate for the respondent.
3. In the present petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the respective petitioners have called in question the notice issued by respondent-assessing officer u
The main legal point established in the judgment is that notices for reopening assessment must be issued within the permissible time limit as prescribed by the relevant provisions of the Income Tax A....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
