A. S. SUPEHIA, D. A. JOSHI
ABDUL KADIR @ KADIR S/O RUKNUDDIN SAIYED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D.A. JOSHI, J.
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present petition is directed against order of detention dated 27.01.2023 passed by the respondent-detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3 (1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) by detaining the petitioner-detenu as defined under section 2 (c) of the Act.
3. Mr. Aditya Pancholi learned advocate for Mr. Rafik Lokhandwala, learned advocate for the detenu submitted that the impugned order of detention of the detenu requires to be quashed and set aside because the detaining authority has passed order of detention solely on the ground of registration of two FIRs being (i) C.R. No. 11210003220988 of 2022 registered with the Adajan Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 380, 457 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and (ii) C.R. No. 11210050230061 of 2022 registered with the Rander Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 380, 457 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code respectively by itself cannot bring the case of the detenu within the purview of definition under section 2 (c) of the Act. Learned
Pushker Mukherjee vs. State of West Bengal
Ram Manohar Lohia vs. State of Bihar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'law and order' and 'public order' as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of FIRs alone may not warrant a detention order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 if the activ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a detention order under the Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act cannot be based solely on the registration of FIRs and must have relevant....
The detention order based on the registration of FIRs must have a nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order, and the authority cannot have recourse under the Act without relevant and cogen....
The registration of FIRs by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily constitute a breach of public order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power of preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 should be invoked only when the alleged act....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of FIRs for specific offenses under the Indian Penal Code does not necessarily have a nexus with the breach of maintenance of....
The simplicitor registration of FIR/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of criminal offenses alone may not be sufficient to invoke the power of preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.