A. S. SUPEHIA, D. A. JOSHI
SACHIN SUNILRAV KAMLE (MARATHI) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D.A. JOSHI, J.
1. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present petition is directed against order of detention dated 29.11.2022 passed by the respondent-detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3 (1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) by detaining the petitioner-detenu as defined under section 2 (c) of the Act.
3. Mr. Gautam, learned advocate for the detenu submitted that the impugned order of detention of the detenu requires to be quashed and set aside because the detaining authority has passed order of detention solely on the ground of registration of two FIRs, one for the offences under Sections 142, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 336 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and another for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 (1) of the Gujarat Police Act respectively by itself cannot bring the case of the detenu within the purview of definition under section 2 (c) of the Act. Learned advocate for the petitioner further submitted that illegal activity likely to be carried out or alleged to have been carried out, as allege
Mallada K. Sri Ram vs. State of Telanganana and Others
Pushker Mukherjee vs. State of West Bengal
The detention order based on the registration of FIRs must have a nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order, and the authority cannot have recourse under the Act without relevant and cogen....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a detention order under the Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act cannot be based solely on the registration of FIRs and must have relevant....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the mere registration of FIRs does not necessarily constitute a breach of public order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities ....
The simplicitor registration of FIR/s by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power of preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 should be invoked only when the alleged act....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of FIRs for specific offenses under the Indian Penal Code does not necessarily have a nexus with the breach of maintenance of....
The registration of FIRs by itself cannot have any nexus with the breach of maintenance of public order as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'law and order' and 'public order' as required under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of criminal offenses alone may not be sufficient to invoke the power of preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the registration of FIRs alone may not warrant a detention order under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 if the activ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.