SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 610

BHARGAV D. KARIA
NAVRATNA CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: AMRISH K. PANDYA.
For the Respondents: HETAL PATEL, B.A. PATEL.

JUDGMENT :

BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Amrish K. Pandya for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Hetal Patel for the respondent No. 1 and learned advocate Mr.B.A.Patel for the respondent No. 2.

1.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for respondents waive service of Rule.

2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

    “(a) Be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 16/12/2022 passed in Revision Application being No. MVV/BKP/Gandhinagar/01/2020 by the respondent No. 1 (Annexure-A) in the interest of justice.

(b) Pending admission and final disposal of the present petition, be pleased to stay the implementation, execution and operation of the order dated 16/12/2022 passed in Revision Application being No. MVV/BKP/Gandhinagar/01/2020 by respondent no. 1 in the interest of Justice.

(c) Be pleased to pass any other and such further orders that may be deemed fit, just and proper in the interest of justice.”

3. The brief facts of the case are as under:

    3.1. It is the case of the petitioners that from the Revenue Records, it appears that the land bearing Block/Surv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top