A. S. SUPEHIA, DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Ajay @ Jaadiyo Sureshbhai Tulshibhai Rathod – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(A.S. Supehia, J.)
1. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present petition is directed against the order of detention dated 10.02.2023 passed by the respondent – detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) by detaining the petitioner– detenue as defined under section 2(c) of the Act.
3. Learned advocate for the detenue submitted that the impugned order of detention of the detenue requires to be quashed and set aside because the detaining authority has passed order of detention solely on the ground of registration of three FIRs, for the offences under Sections 379 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code by itself cannot bring the case of the detenue within the purview of definition under section 2(c) of the Act. Learned advocate for the petitioner further submitted that illegal activity likely to be carried out or alleged to have been carried out, as alleged, cannot have any nexus or bearing with the maintenance of public order and at the most, it can be said to be breach of law and order. Further, except statement of witnesses, regis
Sushanta Kumar Banik v. State of Tripura
Asha Devi v. Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Gujarat and Anr.
Vijay Narain v. State of Bihar
Shaik Nazeen vs. State of Telangana and Ors.
Mallada K. Sri Ram Vs. The State of Telanganana & Ors. 2022 6 Scale 50
Manohar Lohia vs. State of Bihar
Pushker Mukherjee vs. State of West Bengal
K. Nageswara Naidu Versus Collector And District Magistrate Kadapa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.