SUNITA AGARWAL, N. V. ANJARIA
Visual Pharmachem – Appellant
Versus
Gujarat Pollution Control Board – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 12.06.2023 passed by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board directing the closure of the petitioner company, as also imposing interim environmental damage compensation of Rs. 25,00,000/-. Further relief has also been sought to set aside the notice of intention to revoke (withdraw) consent namely CCA No. AWH95670 & H 108228 dated 13.06.2023.
2. Pressing the relief sought in the writ petition, it is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel Mr. Shalin Mehta for the petitioner that the closure order suffers from the vice of natural justice. No show-cause notice at all has been issued to the petitioner before passing the closure order based on inspection of the industry, being run by the petitioner, on 07.06.2023. It is further argued that the closure order has been passed in violation of the procedure prescribed in the statutory provision of The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 (in short as ‘the Act, 1986) read with the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 (in short as ‘the Rules, 1986). The respondent - Gujarat Pollution Control Board (in short as ‘the Board’) has exceeded its jurisdiction under secti
Radha Krishan Industries versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Others
The court upheld the closure of a manufacturing unit for serious environmental violations, emphasizing the authority of pollution boards to act expediently in cases of grave environmental harm.
Jurisdiction of the High Court in entertaining a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, in spite of the alternative statutory remedies, is not affected, specially in a case where the au....
Imposition of environmental compensation requires strict compliance with natural justice principles, including disclosure of adverse material and opportunity to contest quantum.
Administrative decisions must be reasoned and adhere to principles of natural justice to be valid.
Industrial units must obtain necessary pollution-related clearances to operate, and environmental protection laws are backed by the courts.
Administrative decisions affecting rights must be reasoned and adhere to principles of natural justice, failing which they are liable to be set aside.
The principles of natural justice do not apply in cases of gross violations of environmental laws, and the court's discretionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked to perpetuate illegalities.
The Tribunal upheld the closure order for non-compliance with pollution control regulations, affirming the necessity of ensuring environmental standards.
UPPCB must impose environmental compensation on polluting mines under Polluter Pays principle for past violations.
Closure order upheld for non-compliance with pollution control directives despite hearings; mandatory consent and bank guarantee required.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.