SANDEEP N. BHATT
Laljibhai Chhaganbhai Makwana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. It transpires that during the pendency of this application, a subsequent development has taken place by way of executing a sale-deed in favour of the original complainant and as per the submission made by the applicants, the possession is also handed over.
2. By way of present application, the applicants – original accused have prayed for the following reliefs:-
(B) be pleased to call for the records and proceedings of impugned FIR being C.R. No.I- 23/2018 registered with Mahuva Police Station, District-Bhavnagar and after perusing the same, be pleased to quash the impugned FIR (charge-sheet is not yet filed) and all further proceedings in pursuance thereto, in the interest of justice;
(C) be pleased to stay the further proceedings of impugned FIR being C.R. No.I-23/2018 (charge- sheet is yet not filed) registered with Mahuva Police Station, qua the petitioners, pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition;
(D) be pleased to pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper by this Hon’ble court, in the interest of justice.
3. Heard Mr. H.K. Patel, learned
Anand Kumar Mohatta and Anr. Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Department of Home and Anr.
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar
Joseph Salvaraj A. v. State of Gujarat
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat & Anr. reported in 2020 (1) GLR 510
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.