A. S. SUPEHIA
N. D. Timbers – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Since the captioned writ petitions are premised on common facts and the issue involved is also common, they are heard and decided analogously by this common judgment and order.
FACTS:
2. All the petitioners are dealing with the import of timber wood and have to treat such wood with fumigation process for pest control. The petitioners are constrained to file the present petitions against the action of demand of additional fine/charge/penalty 5 times of regular fees by the respondents from the petitioners purportedly under Clause 14 (2) of Chapter VI of the Plant Quarantine Order (Regulation of Import into India), 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the PQ Order, 2003). The petitioners also seek to challenge the condition/s imposed by the respondents by way of Office Memorandum No.8-131/2016-PP.II dated 28.06.2017 and Office Memorandum No.8-131/2016-PP II dated 27.12.2018, thereby demanding the above referred penalty/ additional charges.
3. All the aforementioned OMs refer to the fumigation process undertaken for the imports of timber by using Methyl Bromide (with 48 g/ m3 for 24 hours at 21 degree Celsius). It is an admitted fact that all the petitioners have the requisite
Union Of India vs N.S.Rathnam & Sons
Municipal Corporation Of The City Of Ahmedabad vs. Jan Mohammed Usmanbhal
Cooverjee B.Bharucha vs. Excise Commissioner And The Chief Commissioner, Ajmer
Narendra Kumar vs. Union Of India
Chintaman Rao vs. State of M.P
Franklin Templeton Trustee Services Private Limited Versus Amruta Garg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.