J. B. PARDIWALA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
Gujarat Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Industries Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to the establishment and operation of electricity supply. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments from the appellant regarding tariff authority. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. respondent's arguments opposing the appellant’s claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. court’s observations on tariff jurisdiction and regulatory authority. (Para 29 , 30 , 36 , 46) |
| 5. supreme court rulings on determination of tariffs. (Para 37 , 39) |
| 6. dismissal of the appeal with no order as to costs. (Para 58) |
JUDGMENT :
J.B.PARDIWALA, J.
1. This appeal under Section 27 of the ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ACT , 1998 (for short, “the Act, 1998”) is at the instance of the Gujarat Electricity Board being the original respondent before the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Ahmedabad and is directed against the common order passed by the Commission dated 6th September 2002 declaring the levy and the collection of charges @ 3 times of demand charges on excess drawal of power under clause 15 of the Commercial Circular No.687 dated 21st December 1998 and the revised Commercial
BSES Limited vs. Tata Power Co. Ltd and others reported in (2004) 1 SCC 195
Lonankutty vs. Thomman and another reported in (1976) 3 SCC 528
Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory v. Reliance Energy Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 381
Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd vs. Punjab State Electricity Board and another reported in (2006) 13 SCC 719
Maharashtra Electricity Commission vs. Reliance Energy Ltd and others reported in (2007) 8 SCC 381
Binani Zinc Limited vs. Kerala State Electricity Board reported in (2009) 11 SCC 244
Point of law: Commission cannot be kept in the dark when the effect is amendment to the PPA.
The absence of regulations does not invalidate the Board's authority to set Grid Tariffs under the Electricity (Supply) Act, provided such tariffs adhere to the principles outlined within the Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the jurisdiction of the Electricity Regulatory Commission to regulate tariff applicability and ensure fair and non-discriminatory tariff determi....
Writ petitions challenging regulatory fixation of normative O&M charges as tariff component not maintainable due to statutory appeal to expert Appellate Tribunal under Electricity Act, absent jurisdi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.