IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.Y. KOGJE, J.
Swa. Matru Shri Kesarben V. Savaniya Education Trust Throgh Babubhai Virabhai Savaniya – Appellant
Versus
Alarakhabhai Mohmadkhan Patani – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 9505 of 2020
Decided on : 01-08-2022
Easementary Rights - Civil Suit - Indian Easements Act, Section 5 - The court discussed the claim for easementary right of way by prescription and the essential elements of an easement. It emphasized the need for continuous use of the approach road for 20 years and the requirement of establishing right of easement by way of prescription. The judgment highlighted the principles regarding kinds of easements, essential elements, characteristics, conditions for acquisition, and the acquisition of easements by different categories of persons.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a public education trust, filed a civil suit claiming easementary rights over the property of the respondents. The respondents allegedly obstructed the use of an approach road by the trust and its students, leading to a series of legal actions and disputes.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the continuous use of the approach road for 20 years, a basic requirement for claiming easementary rights under the Indian Easements Act. It directed the trial court to dispose of the civil suit within a year and ordered the respondents to permit ingress and egress of the students without vehicular movement from the plot in question.
Issues: The main issue revolved around the claim for easementary right of way by prescription and the continuous use of the approach road for 20 years. Additionally, the court addressed the obstruction of the approach road and the legal actions taken by both parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for continuous use of the approach road for 20 years and the requirement of establishing right of easement by way of prescription. It also considered the recitals of the sale deed and the nature of the dispute pertaining to the school students' ingress and egress.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed with a direction to the trial court to dispose of the civil suit within a year. The respondents were ordered to permit ingress and egress of the students without vehicular movement from the plot in question. The prayer for stay of the judgment and order was refused.
JUDGMENT :
1. RULE. Learned APP Mr.Dipen Desai waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent No.2.
2. This petition is filed against judgment and order dated 17.07.2020 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Gir Somnath at Veraval in Misc.Civil Appeal No.11 of 2019. By the aforesaid order, the Additional District Judge was pleased to set aside order dated 15.10.2019 passed by the Civil Judge below application Exh.5 in Regular Civil Suit No.64 of 2019. The petitioner herein is the original plaintiff and the respondents are the original defendants. The plaintiff had filed Civil Suit No.64 of 2019 claiming easementary rights over the property of the defendants. The said suit was filed with following prayers:-
(B) Hence, kindly pass a permanent Stay Order (Injunction) in the benefit of us – the Petitioners and against the Opponents this case, stating that the Opponent themselves as well as their servants, their people, Agents or any person from their behalf might not create or not get to create through others any hurdles or prevent us, or shall not quarrel with us while using the above road as our easement right.”
2.1 The petitioner had also filed application Exh.5 praying as under:-
2.2 The 2nd Additional Civil Judge, Veraval was pleased to allow the said application Exh.5 by order dated 15.10.2019, operative part of which reads as under:-
(2) Defendants are directed not to obstruct by any means the ingress and egress of the students, their parents, educational – non educational staff, agents, servants, trustees and others from using the suit property as passage till the final disposal of the suit.
(3) The cost of the application is to follow the result of the suit.”
2.3 The defendants-respondents herein filed appeal being Misc.Civil Appeal No.11 of 2019 before the 3rd Additional District Judge, Gir Somnath at Veraval against the aforesaid order, wherein following order was passed:-
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of continuous use of the approach road for 20 years as a basic element for claiming easementary rights under the Indian Easements A....
The court established that an easementary right can be acquired through long-term, uninterrupted use, even if the specific phrase 'as of right' is not explicitly stated in the pleadings, provided the....
The court affirmed the plaintiff’s easementary right to access her property via the RRR road, rejecting claims of res judicata and procedural deficiencies from the defendant.
The claim for an easementary right of way requires proof of usage 'as of right' and acknowledgment of the opposing party's ownership in order to be valid under the Indian Easements Act, 1882.
Easementary rights must be evidenced by uninterrupted and peaceable enjoyment for twenty years, as per Section 15 of the Indian Easements Act, to be enforceable.
The court ruled that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for a right to passage, as an alternative route was provided and the land was leased to developers.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 22 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882 and its influence on the court's decision regarding the existence and use of ....
A plaintiff can seek a temporary injunction to protect an easementary right even if a formal declaration of that right has not been made, provided they can demonstrate a prima facie case and the abse....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a proper examination of evidence and claims in cases involving right of way, and the need for the court to consider all relevan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.