IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Bhargav D. Karia, J.
Limbdi Vikas Trust Through Mr. Ketankumar Hareshkumar Gangdev & Others - Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India & Others – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 3737 of 2022
Decided On : 31-03-2022
Permission - Homeopathy College - Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 - Section 12A, Homeopathy Central Council (Minimum Standards Requirement of Homeopathic Colleges and attached Hospitals) regulations, 2013 - [12A, MSR Regulations, 2013] - The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent authorities to issue the order of 100 intake capacity for the petitioner-College forthwith for the academic year 2021-2022 instead of 60 intake capacity.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a public Trust running a Homeopathy College, sought extension of permission for an intake of 100 seats for the academic year 2021-2022. The respondent authorities reduced the intake capacity to 60 seats citing deficiencies found during inspections.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent authorities ignored the observations made by the hearing committee and misinterpreted the regulations, leading to a reduction in intake capacity. The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the authorities to issue the order for 100 intake capacity.
Issues: The main issue was the reduction of intake capacity from 100 to 60 seats based on deficiencies found during inspections.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondent authorities misinterpreted and misapplied the regulations, ignored the observations made by the hearing committee, and passed the impugned orders without considering the documentary evidence available on record.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the respondent authorities were directed to issue the order of 100 intake capacity for the petitioner-College forthwith for the academic year 2021-2022 instead of 60 intake capacity.
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.D.C.Dave with learned advocate Mr.Udayan P. Vyas for the petitioners, learned advocate Mr.Siddharth Dave for the respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 5, learned advocate Mr.K.M.Antani for the respondent No.4 and learned advocate Mr.A.R.Thacker for the respondent No.6.
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr.Siddharth Dave waives service of notice of rule for the respondent Nos.1,2,3 and 5, learned advocate Mr.K.M.Antani waives service of notice of rule for the respondent No.4 and learned Advocate Mr.A.R.Thacker waives service of notice of rule for the respondent No.6.
2. With regard to the controversy arising in this petition in narrow compass, with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the same is taken up for hearing.
3. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :
(AA)That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, one or direction commanding Respondent No.1 herein to grant extension of permission to “Limbdi Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital” run and managed by Petitioner No.1 with an intake of 100 seats for admission of students in the discipline of Homoeopathy at the level of graduation leading to the Qualification of BHMS for the academic year 2021-22;
(B) That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring an Order dated 24th March, 2022 passed by Central Government (Annexure “Q”) confirming an Order dated 7th February, 2022 (Annexure “L”) passed by National Commission for Homoeopathy confirming an Order dated 16th December, 2021 (Annexure “I”) passed by the Medical Assessment and Rating Board for Homoeopathy reducing the intake from 100 seats to 60 seats while granting extension of permission for admission to “Limbdi Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital” run and managed by Petitioner No.1 in BHMS Course for the Academic Year 2021-22 as null, void, arbitrary, discriminatory and non-est thereby Violating Article.14 and Article.19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and thereupon the same be quashed and set aside to that extent;
(C) That, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the Admission Committee to include the name of “Limbdi Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital” run and managed by Petitioner No.1 in the centralized process of admission for the academic year 2021-22 with an intake of 100 seats with a further direction to Saurashtra University to enroll students so admitted;
(D) That, pending admission, hearing and final disposal of this Petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow “Limbdi Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital” run and managed by Petitioner No.1 to admit students with an intake of 100 seats to BHMS course for the Academic Year 2021-22 through the centralized process of admission undertaken by Admission Committee of the State with a further direction to Saurashtra University to enroll students so admitted on such terms and conditions as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper;
(E) That, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant such further and other relief as the nature and circumstances of the case may require;
(F) That, this Hon’ble Court be pleas
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the authorities must conduct proper verification and provide the inspection report to the concerned parties before drawing adverse inferences ....
The authorities should consider the explanation and rectification of deficiencies by educational institutions and grant adequate time for addressing the deficiencies, especially in the context of ren....
Point of Law : It emerges that application for renewal made by petitioner is rejected mainly on two grounds that Average Bed Occupancy is less than 30% as per Regulations 2019 and that teaching staff....
Point of Law : Regulation 3(2) with Regulation 9(2) of the Regulations, it is evident that there can be a faculty comprising of consultants who may be appointed on contract basis on part time or on c....
The court emphasized the importance of proper consideration of the petitioner's submissions and the provision of the inspection report for a fair decision.
Regulation no.9 provides for requirements of college which prescribes that there shall be a minimum teaching faculty as per Schedule-IV for the course.
Institutions are not entitled to admit students without valid permission from statutory authorities, and no statutory provision empowers institutions to grant provisional permission to admit students....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.