IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
Shree Gyanjyot Education Trust – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 507 of 2023
Decided on : 23-02-2023
Homeopathy - Denial of Intake Capacity - National Commission for Homeopathy Act 2021 - Regulation 12(1) of the Homeopathy (Post Graduate Degree Course) M.D. (Homeopathy) Regulations 1989 - The court discussed the denial of intake capacity for a Homeopathy Medical College in the faculty of MD Homeopathy. The key legal provision discussed was Regulation 12(1) of the Homeopathy (Post Graduate Degree Course) M.D. (Homeopathy) Regulations 1989, which prescribes the student-Supervisor (Guide) ratio for different cadres of teachers. The court found that the denial of intake capacity based on the approval of faculty members by the Saurashtra University was contrary to Regulation 12(1) and quashed the order, directing the issuance of the letter of permission for increased intake capacity.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Homeopathy Medical College, challenged the denial of 2 seats in Materia Medica and 3 seats in Repertory for the faculty of MD Homeopathy by the Union of India. The college had previously obtained permission to establish the college and had faced legal challenges. The denial was based on the approval of faculty members by the Saurashtra University.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the denial of intake capacity based on the approval of faculty members by the Saurashtra University was contrary to Regulation 12(1) of the Homeopathy (Post Graduate Degree Course) M.D. (Homeopathy) Regulations 1989. The court quashed the order and directed the issuance of the letter of permission for increased intake capacity.
Issues: The main issue was the denial of intake capacity for the Homeopathy Medical College based on the approval of faculty members by the Saurashtra University.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the denial of intake capacity based on the approval of faculty members by the Saurashtra University was contrary to Regulation 12(1) of the Homeopathy (Post Graduate Degree Course) M.D. (Homeopathy) Regulations 1989, which prescribes the student-Supervisor (Guide) ratio for different cadres of teachers.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order and directed the issuance of the letter of permission for increased intake capacity of 2 seats in Materia Medica and 3 seats in Repertory for the academic year 2022-2023.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. D.C.Dave appearing with learned Advocate Mr. Udit N. Vyas for the petitioner and learned Advocate Mr. Harsheel D. Shukla for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Advocate Mr. Harshil D. Shukla waives service of Rule on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 whereas learned Advocate Ms. Krishna G. Rawal appears and waives service of Rule on behalf of Respondent No.1.
3. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.11.2022 at Annexure-K passed by the Respondent No.1 – Union of India to the extent it denied 2 seats in the subject of Materia Medica and 3 seats in the subject of Repertory of Post Graduation Course education to be imparted by the petitioner in its Homeopathy Medical College in the faculty of MD Homeopathy.
4. The brief facts of the case are as under.
4.1 The letter of permission dated 30.9.2014 was issued to establish Homeopathy Medical College in the name and style of ‘B.G.Garaiya Homeopathic Medical College’ for imparting higher course of study upto the level of graduation with the intake capacity of 100 seats for the academic years 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 on a consolidated basis to the petitioner Shree Gyanjyot Education Trust (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner”).
4.2 The college granted admission for the academic years 2012-13 and 2013-14 under various orders of this court as well as the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
4.3 The erstwhile Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act 1973”) was replaced by National Commission for Homeopathy Act 2021 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act 2021”). The petitioner submitted the renewal permission application for the academic year 2020-21 which was declined by the Respondent No.1 – Union of India on 12.1.2021. The said order was challenged by the petitioner by filing Special Civil Application No. 1898 of 2021. This court by order dated 20.2.2021 quashed and set set aside the order dated 12.1.2021 and permitted the college to impart education for the academic year 2020-21.
4.4 The decision of this court was challenged by preferring LPA No.440 of 2021 which was dismissed and SLP (C) No. 15566 of 2021 was also preferred before the Hon’ble Supreme Court which was also dismissed and the order dated 20.2.2021 attained finality.
4.5 The petitioner trust moved an application (scheme) for commencement of a higher course of study at the level of post-graduation leading to the educational qualification of M.D. (Homeopathy) in 3 subjects (1) Materia Medica – 6 seats, (2) Repertory – 6 seats and (3) Organon – 6 seats w.e.f. academic year 2022-23.
4.6 The respondent authority issued a letter of intent on 2.5.2022 granting an in-principal approval to the petitioner for commencing a higher course of study at the level of post graduation. Thereafter inspection was carried out by a team of inspectors appointed by the Respondent No.3 – Board in June 2022.
4.7 The Respondent No.3 Board issued a letter of permission dated 23.8.2022 to commence the post-graduation course with the following intake capacity:
Table-II Intake approved by Respondent No.3 - Board
| Course | Intake applied | Intake granted | Intake refused |
| Materia Medica | 06 | 04 | 02 |
| Repertory | 06 | 03 | 03 |
| Organon | 06 | 03 | 03 |
| Total | 18 | 10 | 08 |
4.8 The petitioner therefore preferred First Appeal under Section 29(5) of the Act 2021 before the Respondent No.2 - National Commission for Homeopathy (hereinafter referred to as “the Respondent No.2-Commission”) on 9.2022. The Respondent No.2-Commission was pleased to allow the Appeal in part by order dated 30.9.2022 and modified the approved intake capacity for the postgraduate courses of the college as under:
| Course | Intake applied | Intake granted | Intake refused |
| Materia Medica | 06 | ||
Point of Law : It emerges that application for renewal made by petitioner is rejected mainly on two grounds that Average Bed Occupancy is less than 30% as per Regulations 2019 and that teaching staff....
The court emphasized the importance of considering the observations made by the hearing committee, interpreting and applying regulations correctly, and making decisions based on documentary evidence.
The authorities should consider the explanation and rectification of deficiencies by educational institutions and grant adequate time for addressing the deficiencies, especially in the context of ren....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the authorities must conduct proper verification and provide the inspection report to the concerned parties before drawing adverse inferences ....
Point of Law : Regulation 3(2) with Regulation 9(2) of the Regulations, it is evident that there can be a faculty comprising of consultants who may be appointed on contract basis on part time or on c....
Regulation no.9 provides for requirements of college which prescribes that there shall be a minimum teaching faculty as per Schedule-IV for the course.
The court emphasized the importance of proper consideration of the petitioner's submissions and the provision of the inspection report for a fair decision.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.