IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
Saiyad Tausif Ahmed Mustufa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Regular Bail – After Chargesheet) No. 4232 of 2024
Decided on : 07-03-2024
NDPS Act - Regular Bail - Section 8(c), 2(c) and 29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which imposes limitations on granting bail, and the definition of 'reasonable grounds' for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. The court also considered the method of weighment of the contraband substance and its impact on determining the commercial quantity. The judgment highlights the interpretation of these legal provisions and their influence on the court's decision.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the application for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with the FIR registered under Sections 8(c), 2(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused was involved in selling contraband drugs and was found in possession of a commercial quantity of Mephedrone.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the contraband substance recovered from the accused's house was of commercial quantity, and there were reasonable grounds for believing that the accused was guilty of the offence. As a result, the limitations prescribed under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied, and the bail application was dismissed.
Issues: The key issues included the possession of a commercial quantity of contraband substance, the interpretation of 'reasonable grounds' for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and the method of weighment of the contraband substance.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the reasonable belief required for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act must be based on substantially probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence. The method of weighment and determination of commercial quantity were also considered in the decision.
Final Decision: The bail application was dismissed, and the rule was discharged, indicating that the limitations prescribed for the grant of bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied in the case.
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-11210050231267 of 2023 registered at Rander Police Station, Surat of the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 2(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. In nutshell, the case of the prosecution is as under;
3.1 The complaint came to be registered by Shri M.D. Mahida, Police Sub-Inspector, D.C.B. Police Station, Surat City stating that on 20.09.2023, Police Constable Chandradipsinh Mahendrasinh, Buckle No.2214 received a tip-off that one Tausif Saiyed, residing at Flat No.501, 5th Floor, Peace Point Apartment, Rander has been secretly indulged in selling of the contraband drug since long who has hidden the contraband substance in the drover of the wooden made cupboard in the last room of his flat. The said information was then reduced into writing and forwarded to the Deputy Police Commissioner, Surat City.
3.2 Thereafter, for the purpose of carrying out raid, Panchas were also called for and after following the due procedure of raid, all the members of the raiding party reached at the given address at around 19:25 hours. On knocking the door of the flat, one person came out and identified himself as Tausif S/o. Mohammed Mustufa. The police then got acquainted the said person with the secret information received by them and entered into the house.
3.3 Thereafter, personal search of Tausif was carried out, however, nothing objectionable was found upon his personal search. After that, the police went to the last room of the flat and made a search of the cupboard from where one plastic zip bag was found lying in the drover containing suspicious powder having pungent smell. Upon being asked about the said powder, the applicant-accused admitted it to be the contraband psychotropic substance. Thereafter, samples were taken and upon testing with the drug detection kit, the samples tested positive for Mephedrone. Hence, the present FIR.
4. Learned advocate Mr. Brijesh Trivedi for learned advocate Mr. P.S. Tolia appearing for the applicant has submitted that the applicant-accused is an innocent young man, aged about 36 years languishing in the judicial custody since 25.09.2023. It is further submitted that the investigation has already been completed and charge-sheet has also been filed. Learned advocate Mr. Trivedi submits that the contraband substance is alleged to have been found from the cupboard of the flat and not from the physical and conscious possession of the applicant-accused and, therefore, rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not be attracted in the present case. It is moreso submitted that the contraband substance was weighed with the weighing scale machine and a Panchnama also came to be drawn in this regard, and from the contents of the said Panchnama it appears that the narcotic substance recovered from the house of the applicant-accused does not fall under the category of commercial quantity. It is submitted that as per the notification issued by the Government of India, commercial quantity of Mephedrone is 50 grams. Admittedly, the narcotic substance recovered from the house of the applicant when weighed along with the plastic zip bag, it was found to be 52.550 grams. It is submitted that total 168 other empty plastic zip bags were also found during the raid, from which, one empty plastic bag was taken for weighment, and on being weighed, the same was found to be of 1.570 grams. Thereafter, the contraband substance was emptied from the original plastic zip bag and filled in the said new plastic zip bag and when weighed along with the new plastic zip bag, the contraband substance was found to be 52.030 grams which after deducing the weight of the plastic bag, i.e., 1.570 grams, found to be 50.460 grams of net quantity. After that, the plastic zip ba
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of 'reasonable grounds' for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the determination of commercial quantity based....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act in drug trafficking cases, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, ....
The court held that in cases of commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if the accused demonstrates reasonable grounds for believing innocence and that he will not reoffend, ....
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that possession of commercial quantity contraband invokes the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, precluding bail. The judgment also emphasizes t....
The limitations prescribed for the grant of bail under Section 37 NDPS Act require substantially probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence.
The judgment established that the gravity of the offence, the impact of the illicit drug trade, and the concept of conscious possession are crucial factors in determining bail eligibility under the N....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.