IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Bhargav D. Karia, Niral R. Mehta, JJ.
M/s Camway Concepts – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 2087 of 2022
Decided On : 04-04-2024
GSTIN Activation - Goods and Service Tax - Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - 24AADHC3412R1ZC, 24AADHC3412R2ZB - The court directed the respondent authorities to activate the GST Number 24AADHC3412R2ZB with effect from 01st July, 2017 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, engaged in the supply of ZENON system/machinery, faced technical errors in the migration process to GST, resulting in the cancellation of provisional GSTINs. The petitioner sought activation of GSTINs to avail input tax credit and pay applicable tax for the period from July 2017 to March 2018.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was unable to utilize the input tax credit during the interregnum period due to technical glitches in the mapping of PAN number with the GST number. The court directed the respondent authorities to activate the GST Number 24AADHC3412R2ZB with effect from 01st July, 2017.
Issues: Technical errors in GST migration process, activation of GSTINs, input tax credit, and tax liability for the period from July 2017 to March 2018.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was not at fault for the technical glitches in the mapping of PAN number with the GST number, and directed the respondent authorities to activate the GST Number 24AADHC3412R2ZB with effect from 01st July, 2017.
Final Decision: The petition is disposed of with the direction to activate the GST Number 24AADHC3412R2ZB with effect from 01st July, 2017 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
ORDER :
Bhargav D. Karia, J.
1. Learned advocate Mr.Sanket Gupta for learned advocate Mr.Anand Nainawati for the petitioner, has tendered draft amendment. The same is allowed in terms of the draft. To be carried out immediately.
2. By way of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs.
“(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Respondents to forthwith activate the GSTIN 24AADHC3412R1ZC of the Petitioners w.e.f. 01.07.2017 and grant final certificate of registration to the Petitioners from 01.07.2017 and appropriating the GST paid and returns filed by the Petitioners under the current GSTIN thereunder, or
(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioners to file returns, avail input tax credit and pay applicable tax under currently active GSTIN 24AADHC3412R2ZB for the period from July 2017 to March 2018, or
(iia) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioners to file returns for the period from July 2017 to March 2018, avail and utilize input tax credit for the said period and pay applicable tax in accordance with law under the currently active GSTIN 24AADHC3412R2ZB;
(iii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioners to file returns, avail input tax credit and pay applicable tax for the period from July 2017 till March 2018 by activating the GSTIN 24AADHC3412R3ZA with effect from 01.07.2017 and also appropriating the GST paid and returns filed by the Petitioners under the current GSTIN ie., 24AADHC3412R2ZB thereunder, and
(iv) Issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Mandamus or a writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India restraining the respondents from imposing any late fee or penalty under the GST Acts for non-filing/late filing of returns by the Petitioners under the GST Acts because of non-completion of migration process of the Petitioners;
3. Brief facts of the case are as under.
3.1 The Petitioner is engaged in the supply of ZENON system/machinery on sale/collection of usage charges to various sugar producing industries in the name and style of Camway Concepts since last many years as a proprietary concern of Chetan Kishorchandra Jobanputra HUF. The petitioner has taken over the said business as a going concern from a partnership firm viz. Shri Mahalaxmi Enterprises, which was registered with the VAT Department under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 vide Registration No.24223901256.
3.2 The Petitioner intimated the VAT Department about the said change in the constitution of the firm. Accordingly, the VAT Department issued an amended registration certificate to the Petitioner.
3.3 It is submitted that with effect from 01st July, 2017 the GST regime has been implemented. The VAT registration of the Petitioner was auto-migrated in GST and they were allotted provisional GSTIN 24ABNFS1856N1ZK in respect of the TIN 242223901256.
3.4 However, due to some technical error, the provisional GSTIN allotted to the Petitioner on migration of data from VAT to GSTIN, was linked with the PAN ABNFS1856N of the partnership firm viz. Shri Mahalakshmi Enterprises inst
AI
The court emphasized the importance of rectifying technical errors in the GST migration process and ensuring the activation of GSTINs to enable taxpayers to avail input tax credit and fulfill tax lia....
The court established that a GST registration can only be cancelled based on a valid application, and erroneous cancellations due to technical issues must be rectified.
Bonafide errors in GST returns should not obstruct rectification where no revenue loss occurs, promoting accuracy and fairness under GST provisions.
The court ruled that system delays in transitioning Input Tax Credit should not prevent a taxpayer from obtaining a refund, emphasizing the need for operational efficiency in tax administration.
Point of Law : Restoration of registration with retrospective effect, the authorities shall see that petitioner may not face any hurdle in filing his returns for the months of August 2021 to March 20....
The court directed the restoration of a cancelled GST registration, permitting the taxpayer to regularize defaults by filing returns and paying taxes, interest, and penalties, as established in the p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.