SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2823

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner Grade-2 – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Bipin Kumar Pandey,Aditya Pandey.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. Since the issues involved in these two writ petitions are similar, therefore, the same are being decided by the common order.

3. The present writ petitions have been filed assailing the order dated 7.1.2022 passed by the respondent no.1 in GST Appeal Nos.67 of 2020 & 66 of 2020, Assessment Year 2018-19 under the provisions of Section 73 of the UP Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, whereby the order passed on 10.07.2020 was confirmed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that prior to commencement of GST regime, the petitioner was registered under the VAT Act as well as under the Service Tax Act under the trade name M/s Akash Enterprises. He further submitted that under the VAT Act, the petitioner is having TIN No.09278704481S and under the Service Tax Act, the petitioner is having registration No.ATIPK4398ND001. He further submitted that after enforcement of GST regime, the petitioner were required to be migrated only one GSTIN, but due to the fault of respondents, two GSTINs were provided by the authorities; one unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top