SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 382

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
Himmatlal Khemraj Soni & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Nandkishor Baburam Tiwari – Respondents
R/Civil Revision Application No.430 of 2023
Decided on : 01-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR VO JOSHI, MR.AMIT R JOSHI

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Sections 12(3)(a) and 13(1)(b) of the Rent Act in a dispute over arrears of rent and unauthorized construction. The court's decision was influenced by the defendants' failure to pay rent for a significant period and their unauthorized construction activities.

Headnote:

Rent Act - Dispute over arrears of rent and unauthorized construction - Sections 12(3)(a) and 13(1)(b) of the Rent Act

Fact of the Case:

The case involves a dispute over arrears of rent and unauthorized construction in the suit premises. The original plaintiff filed H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017 seeking permanent injunction against the defendants from transferring, assigning, or subletting the premises. The defendants were also directed to hand over vacant possession of the premises and pay arrears of rent for three years. The defendants challenged the judgment and decree in Civil Appeal No.57 of 2022, which was dismissed by the Appellate Bench.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the defendants were in arrears of rent for a significant period and had carried out unauthorized construction in the premises. The court held that the case fell within the purview of Section 12(3)(a) of the Rent Act, and the decree passed in H. R. P. Suit No.36 of 2018 had attained finality. The court also considered the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) of the Act in relation to the unauthorized construction.

Issues: The issues framed by the court included whether the defendants had carried out unlawful permanent construction, whether the defendants were not using the premises for the intended purpose, and whether the conduct of the defendants amounted to nuisance and annoyance.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the defendants were in arrears of rent for a significant period and had carried out unauthorized construction, which fell within the purview of Section 12(3)(a) of the Rent Act. The court also considered the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) in relation to the unauthorized construction.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the civil revision application, upholding the judgment and decree passed in H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017 and Civil Appeal No.57 of 2022. The court found no grounds for interference in the impugned judgments.

JUDGMENT :

1. The applicants herein are the original defendants of H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017 disposed of by the learned Small Causes Court, Ahmedabad by judgment and decree dated 29.11.2022 and the original appellant of the Civil Appeal No.57 of 2022 disposed of by the learned Appellate Bench No.2 of the Small Causes Court at Ahmedabad by judgment and decree dated 30.9.2023.

2. Being aggrieved by the impugned concurrent findings arrived by the competent Court the applicants herein have approached this Court challenging the said judgment and decree under Section 12(3)(a) of the Gujarat Rents, Hotel & Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

3. The present civil revision application is instituted by the applicants herein challenging the legality and validity of the judgment and decree dated 30.9.2023 passed by the learned Appellate Bench, Small Causes Court No.2, Ahmedabad in Civil Appeal No.57 of 2022 confirming the judgment and decree passed in the H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017 dated 29.11.2022. The H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017 was preferred by the opponent – original plaintiff for the following reliefs :-

    H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017

“(a) Premises situated on the road in the property known as Lala Maharaj Nu Dahelu lying outside Prem Darwaja in Ahmedabad City, premises bearing Municipal Census No.1729/1, having Muni. Tenement No.0137-27-0006-0019-M and Muni. Tenement No.0137-27-0006-0001-I. Kindly pass the permanent injunction order against the defendant herein and in favour of the plaintiff herein that the defendants herein are restrained from transferring the said premises including both tenement numbers to third party or organization or firm by way of rent, sub-rent or deed of goodwill or deed of agency or deed of partnership and restrained from assigning the possession of the premises to the third party and restrained from modifying, repairing or altering the suit property.

(b) Kindly grant any other and further relief (s) as may deem fit to the Ld. Court.

(c) Kindly grant the entire cost of the suit from the defendant.”

For adjudication of the present dispute whereby the challenge is with respect to the judgment and decree passed by the competent Court in the H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017, it is also relevant to refer to the prayers as prayed for in the H. R.P. Suit No.36 of 2018 which read thus :-

    H. R. P. Suit No.36 of 2018

“(A) Be pleased to provide from the defendants vacant and actual possession of the room premises with Municipal Tenement No.0137-27-0006-0019-M and Municipal Tenement No.0137- 27-0006-0001-I in the Sessions No.1729/1 located in the property called Lala Maharaj Nu Dehlu, out side the Prem Darwaja in Ahmedabad city, whose boundary details are as below:

East : Sariyam Road (From North to South) West : Property of the Plaintiff.

North : Property of the Plaintiff.

South : Property of the Plaintiff.

(B)

Details

Rs. /-

Rent from 01/03/2006 to 30/11/2017.

2,538/-

Profit from 01/12/2017 to 31/01/2018.

36/-

Cost for Notice.

5,000/-

Total (Rs. Seven Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Four only)

7,574/-

(C) The Amount of Municipal Tax bill pending up to 2017/18. Rs.77,011/- (Rs. Seventy Seven Thousand and Eleven only)

Be pleased to pass an order against the defendants to allow us to recover the aforementioned due amounts from the defendants or from any type of their property.

(D) Be pleased to provide Profit at Rs.18/- (Rs. Eighteen only) per month till the possession of the property in suit is received.

(E) Be pleased to provide any other relief(s) as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit.”

4. Both the suits having been consolidated by the learned Small Causes Court, Ahmedabad, the suits being H. R. P. Suit No.549 of 2017 and H. R. P. Suit No.36 of 2018 came to be decided by common judgment and decree dated 29.11.2022 and passed the following order :-

-: ORDER :-

1. The HRP Suit No.549 of 2017 is hereby allowed.

2. The defendants of HRP Suit No.549 of 2017, their men, agents, servants etc. are

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top