IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, PRANAV TRIVEDI, JJ.
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Dhirajkumar Punambhai Mevadawala – Respondent
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 138 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7516 of 2022 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 139 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3532 of 2022 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 140 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4437 of 2022 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 166 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7123 of 2022
Decided on : 22-04-2024
Recruitment Cancellation - Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited - [The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, The Right to Information Act, 2005] - The court held that the cancellation of the recruitment process was arbitrary and directed the Corporation to continue with the selection process from the stage it had been cancelled. The court also directed that if the concerned respondents fulfill all the criteria, the Corporation should consider their case for appointments.
Fact of the Case:
The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited issued an advertisement for various posts in 2019. After the issuance of a final merit list and physical verification of documents, the Corporation cancelled the recruitment process for certain posts. The respondents challenged the cancellation, alleging it was arbitrary.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the cancellation of the recruitment process was arbitrary and directed the Corporation to continue with the selection process from the stage it had been cancelled. The court also directed that if the concerned respondents fulfill all the criteria, the Corporation should consider their case for appointments.
Issues: The main issues were whether the cancellation of the recruitment process was arbitrary and whether the respondents were entitled to appointments and salaries from the date of filing the petitions.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the cancellation of the recruitment process was arbitrary and directed the Corporation to continue with the selection process from the stage it had been cancelled. The court also directed that if the concerned respondents fulfill all the criteria, the Corporation should consider their case for appointments.
Final Decision: The appeals of the Corporation were partly allowed, modifying the directions of the learned Single Judge. The court upheld the direction to continue the selection process but modified the direction to grant appointments and payment of salaries with effect from the date of filing the petitions. The direction to initiate action against the officers concerned and the direction to pay salaries from the date of filing of the petition were stayed.
JUDGMENT :
BIREN VAISHNAV, J.
1. These Letters Patent Appeals are filed by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited challenging the oral judgment dated 08.12.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge. By the aforesaid oral judgment, the learned Single Judge set aside the decision of the appellants dated 01.02.2022 by which they canceled the recruitment for certain posts in the Corporation. The learned Single Judge has further directed the Corporation to forthwith continue with the selection process from the stage it had been cancelled and issued directions that if the respondents who were the original petitioners, fulfill all the criteria, such respondents shall be granted appointment and be paid salaries for the respective posts from the date of filing of these petitions.
2. In paragraph no.14.4 of the judgment, the learned Single Judge while directing the Registry to send a copy of the judgment to the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum for information has directed that action be initiated against the concerned officer for having indulged in taking a decision of cancellation of recruitment at the behest of the Union.
3. Facts in brief are as under:
3.1 The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, in the year 2019 issued advertisement no.01/2019 for various posts for the Western Sector, Gujarat State. Amongst the positions advertised for were that of Pharmacists Grade-4, Nurse Grade-4 and Junior Health Attendant. Pursuant to the advertisement, the respondents herein had applied for the respective posts. It is the case of the petitioners that the appellants after issuing a final merit list and after physical verification of the documents of the shortlisted candidates including the petitioners, the respondents herein, after three years of the issuance of the advertisement, cancelled the recruitment process for the said posts only. It is the case of the petitioners that after physical verification of the documents in January 2020, since the candidature of some of the respondents was rejected on the ground of not possessing domicile certificates, the aggrieved candidates had preferred Special Civil Application No.2054 of 2020 and allied petitions. By an order dated 27.02.2020, this Court directed the respondent authorities to consider the domicile certificates as valid and further issued specific directions to the appellants to complete the recruitment process within 12 weeks from the date of passing of the order.
3.2 It is the case of the petitioners who are the respondents herein that the appellants started implementing the directions for other posts in the advertisement but differed the issuance of appointment orders concerning the present post in question. When RTI applications were filed, it was informed to the candidates that the process is still pending consideration. The appellants then preferred an application for extension of time and by an order dated 18.06.2021 time was granted to complete the exercise till 15.07.2021. Since the recruitment process was not completed, the respondent filed a Misc. Application seeking compliance of the directions. It was during the course of the application by the petitioners seeking compliance that the appellants filed a reply stating that the management had considered and decided to cancel the recruitment process for the posts in question. On a notification being issued on 01.02.2022, the petitioners approached this Court by filing the petitions challenging such cancellation of recruitment process on the ground that the notification cancelling the recruitment process was arbitrary.
3.3 Since LPA No.139 of 2024 was argued as the lead matter, in the petition from which this Letters Patent Appeal arises, the prayers read as under:
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the notification/order dated
East Coast Railway and Another v. Mahadev Appa Rao and others reported in (2010) 7 SCC 678.
Jatinder Kumar and others v. State of Punjab and others reported in (1985) 1 SCC 122
State of M.P. and others v. Ragahuveer Singh Yadav and others reported in (1994) 6 SCC 151.
State of Uttranchal and another v Sunilkumar Vaish and others reported in (2011) 8 SCC 670.
State of Manipur and Another v. Takhelmayum Khelendro Meitei and others reported in (2019) 3 SCC 331
Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India reported in (1991) 3 SCC 47
The State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander Marwaha and others reported in (1974) SCC 220
Decisions affecting public employment must be lawful and justified, with candidates not holding an indefeasible right to appointment, but protected from arbitrary state actions.
The State's decision to cancel recruitment must be bona fide and non-arbitrary; candidates do not have an absolute right to appointment despite being placed in the merit list.
Candidates do not have a vested right to insist on the completion of a recruitment process if it is cancelled based on valid reasons, including changes in qualifications and reservation policies.
Point of Law : It is open for the authority concerned not to fill up vacancies but such decision should not be arbitrary or unreasonable.
Mere selection in recruitment does not confer indefeasible right to appointment if process tainted by procedural irregularities confirmed by inquiry; authority may bona fide withhold without hearing ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.