SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 482

VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Chaudhari Karshanbhai Kuberbhai – Appellant
Versus
Collector/District Magistrate Patan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.J. Yagnik
For the Respondent: Dhwani Tripathi.

JUDGMENT :

VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.

1. Issue RULE, returnable forthwith. Mr. Akshat Khare, learned advocate and Ms. Dhwani Tripathi, learned Assistant Government Pleader waive service of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent nos. 6 and 7 and respondent-State authorities receptively.

2. Heard Mr. A.J. Yagnik, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Akshat Khare, learned advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 6 and 7 and Ms. Dhwani Tripathi, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State authorities.

3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Petition reads thus:

    3.1. The petitioners herein are the farmers and agriculturists, whose lands are situated within the revenue limits either of Patan, Saraswati or Chanasma Taluka of District: Patan and who are affected by 765 KV D/C Banaskantha - Ahmedabad Transmission Line Project to lay down overhead transmission line from the lands of the petitioners. The respondent no. 6 herein having undertaken construction of the aforesaid transmission line project, approached the respondent - District Magistrate under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, seeking permission to lay down transmis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top