JUDGMENT :

1. By way of present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.1.2013 passed by the Disciplinary Authority as well as order dated 30.5.2014 passed by the Appellate Authority. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-

“8(A) Considering the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PNB vs. Kunj Behari Mishra (1998 SCC (L&S) 1783), & considering the disinclination of the Appellate Authority of the Bank to decide the appeal dated 28/03/2013 of the petitioner and further considering the age of the petitioner (Date of Birth: 15/03/1933), & amp; the age of superannuation of the petitioner (March 1991), the Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 29.1.2013 and the order dated 30.5.2014 passed by the appellate authority at Annexure “G”.

8(AA) Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 30th May, 2014 produced at “Annexure G” to the petition.”

2. The facts giving rise to present petition are that the pe