SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
Prokash Chandra Maity – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Writ petition is directed against order dated 16th November, 1998 passed by the Board of Directors of North Suburban Wholesale Consumers’ Co operative Society Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “said Society”) being respondent no.5 whereby petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 17th November, 1998. At the same time the order of the appellate authority dated 11th June, 2013 affirming order of the disciplinary authority is also under challenge in this writ petition. Petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 19th May, 1997 issued by the respondent no.5 with immediate effect. Along with suspension by the said order dated 19th May, 1997 charge-sheet was also served upon the petitioner for initiation of disciplinary proceeding.
2. Petitioner initially joined as Lifting Assistant and thereafter promoted to the post of Officer. Ultimately he was appointed as in-charge of the Departmental Store at Baranagar (hereinafter referred to as the “said Departmental Store”) vide order dated 17th March, 1992 issued by the respondent no.5. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that by appointment order dated 17th March, 1992 along with petitioner Sri. H.P. Ghosh
Arjed Ali Gazi vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Allahabad Bank And Others vs. Krishna Narayan Tewari
Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies vs. Sachindra Nath Pandey
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Nawab Hussain
State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur vs. Nemi Chand Nalwaya
State Bank of India & Ors. vs. Ramesh Dinkar Punde
The Secretary, Forest Department & Ors. vs. Abdur Rasul Chowdhury
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine witnesses and the provision of relevant documents....
It is a duty of Inquiry Officer to scan entire evidence in order to arrive at a finding after judging case of all the parties, adhering to the principles of natural justice, otherwise, inquiry is vit....
The principles of natural justice require that a delinquent employee be given a copy of the preliminary enquiry report before the disciplinary authority arrives at its conclusions with regard to the ....
Non-supply of inquiry report violates natural justice but is cured by subsequent supply with penalty order if no prejudice shown; criminal acquittal on technical grounds does not bind disciplinary pr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the punishment imposed must be proportionate and in accordance with the principles of natural justice, and the failure to supply relevant docu....
A fair inquiry process is essential in disciplinary proceedings, and failure to adhere to procedural requirements can invalidate dismissal orders.
A disciplinary inquiry must follow procedural fairness, including the establishment's burden to prove charges through evidence, especially when major penalties are at stake.
No pay cannot be applied to the present facts of the case, since the petitioner did not attend to work on account of illegal order of suspension and dismissal from service, passed by the appellants h....
The disciplinary authority must provide reasons for disagreeing with an Inquiry Officer's findings to uphold natural justice.
The court affirmed that the burden of proving actual prejudice from non-supplied documents lies with the petitioner, and mere allegations of procedural irregularity do not invalidate disciplinary pro....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.