Back
DEVAN M. DESAI
Keshu Savdas – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Collector and Prant Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay under section 5 (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the significance of timely applications for appeals. (Para 3) |
| 3. land acquisition details and compensation awarded (Para 4) |
| 4. applicants explain delay in filing appeal (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. opposition argues delay causes insufficient explanation (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. court's analysis of applicants' delay and lack of vigilance (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. legal standards for condonation of delay (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 8. conclusion: condonation application rejected (Para 17) |
ORDER :
1. The captioned Civil Applications are filed under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT , 1963 for condonation of delay of 1151 days caused in preferring the First Appeal.
2. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.
3. Challenge is made by the applicants against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2018 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge, Jamnagar in Land Reference Case Nos. 35 and 36 of 2011 in group Land Acquisition Reference Case Nos. 35 to 37 of 2011.
4. The original claimants filed Land Reference cases under Section 18 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1984 (for short ‘the Act’) for enhancement of compensation aw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
