SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 796

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA, JJ.
M/s. Ridava Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
Chief Commissioner Of Customs & Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 13963 of 2023 with R/Special Civil Application No. 6075 of 2022
Decided On : 02-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. Fafiq, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Rashmitha Ramchandran for Mr. Nimit Y. Shukla.
For the Respondents: Aaditya D. Bhatt, Chandni S. Joshi, Mr. Anuj K. Trivedi, Mr. C.B. Gupta, Notice Served.

Headnote:

waiver - customs regulations - Regulation 6(1)(L) of the Handling of Cargo in Custom Area Regulations 2009, Regulation 10(1)(L) of the Sea Cargo Manifest and Trans-shipment Regulations 2018 - The court discussed the petitioner's request for waiver of demurrage/storage charges and detention charges in relation to the import and re-export of goods, and interpreted the customs regulations to determine the liability of the petitioner for these charges. The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Regulation 6(1)(L) of the Handling of Cargo in Custom Area Regulations 2009 and Regulation 10(1)(L) of the Sea Cargo Manifest and Trans-shipment Regulations 2018, which led to the direction that the petitioner shall not be liable to pay demurrage, detention, and ground rent charges to respondent No.3 from 10/2/2021/11.2.2021 till today.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed for import and re-export of goods, which were seized and subjected to penalty by the customs authorities. The petitioner appealed the penalty and sought waiver of demurrage/storage charges and detention charges.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was not liable to pay demurrage, detention, and ground rent charges to respondent No.3 from 10/2/2021/11.2.2021 till today, based on the interpretation of customs regulations.

Issues: The issues involved the liability of the petitioner for demurrage/storage charges and detention charges, as well as the authority of the customs regulations to waive such charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Regulation 6(1)(L) of the Handling of Cargo in Custom Area Regulations 2009 and Regulation 10(1)(L) of the Sea Cargo Manifest and Trans-shipment Regulations 2018, which led to the direction that the petitioner shall not be liable to pay demurrage, detention, and ground rent charges to respondent No.3 from 10/2/2021/11.2.2021 till today.

Final Decision: The court directed that the petitioner shall not be liable to pay demurrage, detention, and ground rent charges to respondent No.3 from 10/2/2021/11.2.2021 till today, and that the petitioner shall lift the goods as early as possible within a period of five weeks from the date of the judgment.

ORDER :

Bhargav D. Karia, J.

1. Special Civil Application No. 13963 of 2023 is filed for the following prayers: -

    “12 (a). Issue a writ of mandamus, direction, or any other orders, directing the offices of respondent 1&2, to issue demurrage/storage waiver letter, allowing 100% wavier of demurrage/storage charges, directing the 3rd Respondent to waive the entire demurrage charges accrued on the tank containers and allowing Petitioner to cross-stuff/load the entire good in Tank Containers Nos. RLTU2009510, CXTU1133607, SEGUB062395, BOTU51501 78, CRXU8648662, RFCU8218463, BOTU5150310, SEGU80 41155, BOTU5150711 and CXTU1152612 (Pertaining of Shipping Bills No. 7490594 & 7603281, dated 28.12.2020 & 31.12.2020), cross-stuffed into fresh tanks containers as per the choice of the Petitioner, without payment of demurrage charges to Respondent No.3.

(b) Issue a writ of mandamus, direction, or any other orders, directing the offices of respondent 1&2, to issue demurrage/ storage waiver letter, allowing 100% wavier of demurrage/storage charges, directing the 3rd Respondent to waive the entire demurrage charges accrued on the tank Container detention charges, directing the 4th Respondent to waive the entire demurrage charges and allowing Petitioner to cross- stuff/load the entire good in Tank Containers Nos. RLTU2009510, CXTU1133607, SEGU8062395, BOTU5150178, CRXU8648662, RFCU8218463, BOTU5150310, SEGU8041155, BOTU5150711 and CXTU1152612 (Pertaining of Shipping Bats No. No. 7490594 & 7603281, dated 28.12.2020 & 31.12.2020), cross-stuffed into fresh tanks containers as per the choice of the Petitioner, without payment of detention charges to the Respondent No.4 and return the above empty Tanks Containers back to the possession of the 4th Respondent at Kandla and;

Amendment Carried out as per Order Dated 07/12/2023: -

"(ba)... Issue writ of mandamus, direction, or any other order quashing and setting aside the order passed by the Respondent no.2 at annexure T/A in F.No. S/15-10/SIIB/2020-2021, in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard Mr. M.Rafiq, learned Senior advocate with Ms.Rashmitha Ramchandra, learned advocate for Mr.Nimit Y.Shukla, learned advocate (SCA No.13963 of 2023); Ms. Paurami B.Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner (SCA No.6075 of 2022) and respondent No.4 (SCA No.13963 of 2023); Mr.C.B.Gupta, learned advocate; Mr. Anuj Trivedi, learned advocate and Mr.Aditya Bhatt, learned advocate for the respective respondents

3. The brief facts of the Special Civil Application 13963 of 2023 are as under :-

3.1 The petitioner filed one warehouse Bill of Entry No. 9846933 on 7.12.2020 for import of 1900 MT. of “Denatured Ethyl Alcohol” for export. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Goods Removal Form from warehouse on 23.12.2020 for re-export.

3.2 Thereafter, shipping bills were filed on 28.12.2020 and 31.12.2020 for re-export of party quantity of 194.59 MT of “Denatured Ethyl Alcohol”. Samples of goods were drawn and sent to CRCL, Kandla for Testing.

3.3 The show cause notice dated 19.1.2021 was issued by the Commissioner-Customs-Kandla and by seizure memo dated 10th/11th February, 2021, the goods in question were seized.

3.4 The petitioner by letter dated 31st March, 2021 requested the respondent-custom authorities to release the containers. An order in original dated 2.5.2021 was passed by the Additional Commissioner of Customs confiscating goods and on levying penalty on the goods in question.

3.5 The petitioner challenged the order of penalty by preferring an appeal before the Commissioner of customs (Appeals) on 28.5.2021 along with a letter to release the goods for export along with the proof of payment of redemption, fine and penalty.

3.6 The Commissioner Appeal by order dated 30.11.2021 reduced the penalty amount from Rs.3,93,000,00/- (Rupees Three Crore Ninety Three Lakh only) to Rs.22,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty two Lakh only) and also allowed the re-export of the goods.

3.7 The petitioner on payment of redemption fine money and exported around 170

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top