IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C. DOSHI, J.
Paresh Rameshchandra Shastri - Applicant
Versus
State of Gujarat & Ors. - Respondents
R/Criminal Revision Application (For Maintenance) No. 1159 of 2023 With Criminal Misc. Application (For Withdrawal/Disbursement of Amount) No. 1 of 2023 With R/Criminal Revision Application No. 1629 of 2023
Decided On : 22-03-2024
Maintenance - Family Dispute - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 125 - 125(4) - 125(3) - 125(1) - 125(2) - 125(1)(a) - 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act - Domestic Violence Act - CR.MA No.1273 of 2015 - CR.RA No.1629 of 2023 - CR.RA no.1159 of 2023
Fact of the Case:
The wife filed a maintenance application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging ill-treatment, physical and mental abuse, and extra-marital affairs by the husband. The husband's defense was struck off, and the wife's evidence indicated withdrawals from joint accounts for educational and marriage expenses of the daughter. The daughter withdrew her maintenance claim against her father. The husband's income was shown as Rs.13,85,894/- in 2015 and Rs.3,07,386/- in 2019-20.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the wife proved destitution and harassment, justifying her reason to live separately. The court noted the husband's reduced income and the wife's withdrawals for daughter's expenses. The court enhanced the maintenance from Rs.10,000 to Rs.20,000 per month, considering the husband's wealth and the wife's comfortable living standard.
Issues: The issues revolved around the wife's entitlement to maintenance under Section 125 of the Code, the husband's income, the wife's withdrawals, and the daughter's withdrawal of her maintenance claim.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty to prevent destitution and vagrancy, the need for evidence to establish income, and the balancing of interests and financial capacity in determining maintenance. The court considered the husband's reduced income, the wife's withdrawals for daughter's expenses, and the daughter's withdrawal of her maintenance claim.
Final Decision: The court enhanced the maintenance from Rs.10,000 to Rs.20,000 per month and dismissed the husband's revision application. The husband was also ordered to pay a cost of litigation in the sum of Rs.10,000 to the wife.
JUDGMENT :
Since the judgment and order dated 17/04/2023 in CR.MA No.1273 of 2015 passed by the learned Family Court, Ahmedabad has given rise to the present revision applications, both the revisions are heard and decided together. With the consent of learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties, the main matter/s are taken up for hearing.
2. CR.RA No.1629 of 2023 is filed by wife – Mauna Paresh Shastri and CR.RA no.1159 of 2023 is filed by the husband – Paresh Rameshchandra Shastri assailing impugned judgment and order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, the parties are referred to as per their original status before the learned Court below i.e. wife and husband.
3. The wife filed maintenance application being CR.MA No.1273 of 2015 under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘the Code’) before the learned Family Court wherein by an order dated 27/04/2023, the learned Family Court was pleased to partly allow the said application and directed the husband to pay Rs.10,000/- per month towards maintenance from 21/05/2015 i.e. from the date of filing of the petition and ordered to pay cost of Rs.2,000/-. This order is called to challenge by both the parties.
4. The short facts of the case are that husband initially married Ms. Ushaben Vaidh, who passed away in a road accident. Respondent no. 3 is their daughter, born out of the first wedding. The husband- Paresh Rameshchandra Shastri got married with wife- Mauna Paresh Shastri on 11.02.1996. Since the time of marriage, on trivial issues husband and wife engaged in fight inter se. In the year 1996, they used to live in the house of the husband’s family at their Paldi residence; but later on they moved to another house at Satellite area where both husband and wife used to live separately along with daughter. Previously, in the year 2008, the wife filed an FIR under Section 498A of IPC against the husband and his relatives, which was settled amicably and whereby the wife had stated that she had filed the said case in a haste.
4.1 Thereafter, the wife filed Criminal Misc. Application no. 120 of 2015 before the Learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad under the provisions of Domestic Violence Act which came to be rejected. Appeal against the said order also came to be rejected. It is submitted that revision is pending against judgment and order passed by learned Court below.
4.2 The wife filed maintenance application being Criminal Misc. Application No.1273 of 2015 under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking maintenance stating inter alia that they married on 11/02/1996 at Ahmedabad; the husband was earlier married to Ushaben R. Valdhva who died in a road accident and out of said wedlock the husband had one daughter. It is stated that soon after the marriage the husband was not keeping good behaviour with wife, used to ill-treat and subjected to mental and physical cruelty. It is stated that the husband used to beat and physically and mentally abuse the wife. It is submitted that thereafter the wife came to know that husband is having extra-marital affairs with the sister of the first wife who is unmarried and when the wife questioned the husband about the said affairs, he got violent and started abusing and beating the wife. It is stated therein that the wife till now thought of not filing present petition but thinking that wisdom will prevail and the husband will change his attitude but on each and every occasion the husband used to behave, abnormally with the wife in her matrimonial house. It is stated that the husband is a wholesale supplier of veterinary medicine, (other work-renting sale of godown, investing in stock market) and is earning a good income and therefore, it is required that necessary order be passed and husband be directed to make the arrangements for residence of the wife as per the status of the husband and also the husband be directed to pay the maintenance and alimony to the wife as per the status of
Sanjay Kumar Sinha vs. Asha Kumari
Bhuwan Mohan Singh vs. Meena & Ors.
Captain Ramesh Chander Kaushal V/s. Mrs. Veena Kaushal and Ors.
The judgment emphasizes the duty to prevent destitution and vagrancy, the need for evidence to establish income, and the balancing of interests and financial capacity in determining maintenance under....
The main legal point established is that under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a spouse who is capable of maintaining themselves may be denied maintenance allowance, but the responsibi....
The husband has a statutory duty to maintain his wife and child under Section 125 Cr.P.C., and claims of insufficient income must be substantiated with credible evidence.
A husband must ensure his wife’s financial support and maintain her standard of living unless he proves his inability to earn, as emphasized under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and the Domestic Violence Act.
The court affirmed that a wife is entitled to maintenance unless disqualified, emphasizing the husband's obligation to support her, especially when she has been subjected to harassment.
A husband is legally obligated to maintain his wife and children under Section 125 Cr.P.C., and claims of financial incapacity must be supported by credible evidence; failure to do so can result in t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.