RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Shambhu Chaudhary S/o Sonelal Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Veena Devi W/o Shambhu Chaudhary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party.
2. This revision application has been filed for setting aside the judgment dated 25.04.2022 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Maintenance Case No. 217 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the learned Principal Judge, Family Court has allowed Rs.10,000/-per month as maintenance to the opposite party-wife and her minor children by the tenth day of every month from the date of filing of the maintenance application. The learned Family Court further directed the husband-petitioner to pay the arrears within three months of the passing of the order.
Brief Facts of the Case
3. The petitioner and the opposite party in the present case are the husband and wife respectively. They were married on 25.05.1997 in accordance with Hindu Rites and Customs. The couple was blessed with four children. It is alleged by the wife-opposite party that her husband and his family started demanding Rs.3,00,000/-in dowry. Due to non-fulfillment of the demand, the wife was allegedly physically and mentally tortured. There was also a panchayati by local person but
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.