S. V. PINTO
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Chimanbhai Ranchidbhai Chudasama – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 23.11.2006 passed by the learned Special Judge, Anand (herein after referred to as ‘the learned Trial Court’) in Special (ACB) Case No. 36 of 2006 (Old Case No. 3 of 2003), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondent from the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(D) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (herein after referred to as ‘the P.C.Act’). The respondent is hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ at he stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:
2.1. That the accused was working as a Talati-Cum-Mantri, Class-III, at Khadodhi Gram Panchayat, Taluka, Khambhat, District Anand and was a public servant. That Motibhai Chauhan, the father of the complainant Ganpatbhai Chauhan and Mohanbhai Chauhan, the uncle of the complainant Ganpatbhai Chauhan, had purchased a house from Gangaben, daughter of Bhaiba Aatabhai, resident of village
B. Jayaraj Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2014) 13 SCC 55.
K. Shanthamma Vs. State of Telengana reported in (2022) 4 SCC 574.
Mukhtar Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2017) 8 SCC 136.
Neeraj Dutta Vs. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) reported in (2023) 4 SCC 731.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.