IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, NISHA M. THAKORE, JJ.
Deputy Chief Executive Engineer - Appellant
Versus
Lilaji Ranchhodji Thakore & Anr. – Respondents
R/First Appeal No. 2355 of 2017
Decided On : 21-02-2024
Land Acquisition Act - Railway Land Acquisition - Section 54 - Relevant Acts and Sections: Section 4, Section 6, Section 11, Section 18 - The court discussed the process of land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, including the issuance of notifications under Section 4 and Section 6, the determination of market value under Section 11, and the right to seek reference under Section 18. The court also considered the relevance of previous decisions in similar cases and the acceptance of those decisions by the State Government.
Fact of the Case:
The Railway Authority sought to acquire land for the construction of a new railway line. The landowners challenged the compensation amount determined by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and sought reference. The Reference Court partly allowed the reference and enhanced the compensation, leading to an appeal by the Railway Authority.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the land acquisition process was conducted in accordance with the law. It considered the previous decisions in similar cases and the acceptance of those decisions by the State Government. The court concluded that there was no error in the award and dismissed the appeal.
Issues: Dispute over compensation amount for land acquisition, relevance of previous decisions in similar cases, acceptance of decisions by the State Government.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the proper adherence to land acquisition procedures, consideration of previous decisions, and the acceptance of those decisions by the State Government.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the interim order was vacated. The court directed the release and disbursement of the compensation amount to the claimants.
JUDGMENT :
(Nisha M. Thakore, J.)
1. The present appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, is directed against the judgment and award dated 31.08.2016 passed below Exhibit 38 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Patan, in Land Acquisition Reference No.310 of 2011 (Main case) and other allied matters. By the said common judgment and award, the learned Judge has partly allowed the Reference and has enhanced the amount of compensation determining the market value of land acquired at the rate of Rs. 106/- per Sq. Mtr. in lands, having no right of entry through Nalia Marg or existing Pakka road for entry and Rs.105/- per Sq. Mtr. in lands having right of entry through Nalia road. Apart from the aforesaid enhanced amount of compensation, the learned Judge has also awarded consequential statutory benefits of solatium along with interest.
2. In order to appreciate the dispute involved in the appeal, it would be appropriate to revisit the relevant dates of acquisition proceedings. The same are summarized as under:
2.1 The appellant - Railway Authority intended to acquire various parcels of land situated in village: Kalodhi of District: Patan for the construction of Patan – Bhildi New Broad Gauge Railway line for public purpose. The Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act being LAQ Case No.5/2009 was published in the Gazette on 26.08.2009 declaring the aforesaid intention to acquire the lands specified in the schedule. The aforesaid Notification was subsequently published in two local newspapers and was also displayed at the convenient places in the locality on 20.9.2009 and 17.11.2009 respectively. The said Notification was followed by Notification issued under Section 6 of the Act. Finally, the Notification under Section 6 of the Act was later on published on 01.04.2020.
2.2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Patan, after following procedure prescribed under the Act, passed an award under Section 11 on 16.07.2011 in LAQ Case No.5/2009. The Special Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs.7,66,763/- for total acquired land of 4 H. - 03 RA and 35 Sq. Mtr.
2.3 Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid market value determined by the Land Acquisition Officer, the land owners sought Reference under Section 18 of the Act. The said References were registered with the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Patan on 15.12.2011 being Land Reference Case Nos.310 to 319 of 2011. Considering the facts of the case, the learned Judge by an order dated 23.01.2014 had consolidated the aforesaid Land Reference Cases, whereby the Land Reference Case No.310 of 2011 was treated as main matter.
2.4 The Reference Court partly allowed the Reference Cases and awarded the compensation by fixing market value of lands acquired at the rate of Rs.118.05 Paise per Sq. Mtr. The original claimants – land owners have mainly relied upon the earlier decision of the Reference Court in the case of acquisition of lands of village: Vayad being Land Reference Case Nos.1 of 2012 to 42 of 2012, decided on 30.12.2015, which was produced at Exhibit 33 as well as the decision of the Reference Court dated 16.07.2014 in Land Reference Case Nos.240 of 2011 to 250 of 2011, wherein the lands were acquired for Sujalam Sufalam Spreading Canal Yojana produced at Exhibit 32.
Hence, this appeal against the aforesaid award of enhancement at the instance of Railways.
3. Ms. Archana Amin, learned advocate for the appellant Railway has at the outset, placed on record the letter dated 01.12.2015 addressed by the Narmada, Water Resource, Water Supply & Kalpasar Department to the Executive Engineer, Sujalam Sufalam Spreading Canal Yojana, Circle No.2, Kherva, Mehsana and has submitted that the State Government has accepted the aforesaid decision dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Reference Case Nos.240 to 250 of 2011 in the case of acquisition of land of village: Vayad, Taluka and District: Patan for Sujalam S
The proper adherence to land acquisition procedures and the relevance of previous decisions, accepted by the State Government, influenced the court's decision.
The court upheld the Reference Court's valuation of agricultural land compensation, emphasizing reliance on expert opinions and valid market evidence in determining fair compensation under the Land A....
The determination of market value and compensation under the Land Acquisition Act is based on a detailed consideration of various factors, including geographical features and potential value of the a....
The previous award can be a relevant exemplar for determining the market value of land under acquisition.
The court ruled that inconsistent treatment of claimants by the State in land acquisition cases constitutes discrimination, affirming the reference court's award of additional compensation.
The court affirmed that compensation for acquired land should be calculated with a 20% deduction based on established valuation standards, modifying the Reference Court's decision to reflect correct ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.