Back
A. S. SUPEHIA, MAUNA M. BHATT
USHABEN PURUSOTTAMDAS POPAT – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDENT/HONORARY SECRETARY – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present appeals are filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865. The captioned Letters Patent Appeal No. 482 of 2015 in Special Civil Application No. 8492 of 2003 emanates from the judgment and order dated 30.09.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge (Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.R. Udhwani), wherein and whereby the learned Single Judge had remanded the matter back to the District Education Officer (DEO) after 16 years by quashing and setting aside the impugned orders, whereas Letters Patent Appeal No. 280 of 2017 in Special Civil Application No. 19162 of 2015 emanates from the judgment and order dated 10.01.2017, wherein and whereby the learned Single Judge (Coram: Hon’ble Ms. Justice Sonia Gokani) has again remanded the matter to the DEO.
BRIEF FACTS:
2. The appellant as of now is more than 78 years of age. She was appointed as a teacher in the year 1977. She was subsequently appointed as a Principal in the school run by the respondent No. 1 on 07.01.1986. Thereafter, she was suspended by the order dated 27.11.1998 in the contemplation of the departmental inquiry and thereafter, a show-cause notice dated 12.12.1998 was issued to her. It appea
The court established that failure to complete a departmental inquiry within the prescribed period invalidates the dismissal, entitling the employee to retirement benefits.
The court established that employees are entitled to interest on delayed retirement benefits when the delay is due to administrative inaction.
Disciplinary proceedings must be initiated before retirement to continue post-retirement; unilateral alteration of service records without notice violates natural justice.
The court established that compliance with procedural requirements under the Gujarat Higher Secondary School Services Tribunal Act is essential for valid dismissal of a teacher.
Significant delays in disciplinary proceedings can violate principles of natural justice, leading to quashing of penalties and entitlement to benefits.
The court ruled that the Secretary must properly examine administrative lapses in delayed pension payments, as mandated by Section 197-A of the Assam Service (Pension) Rules, 1969.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
