SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1225

A. S. SUPEHIA, MAUNA M. BHATT
VALLABHBHAI GANGARAM VAMZA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : KHUSHBU D. CHHAYA.

ORDER :

1. The present appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865 is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.10.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in the captioned writ petition, whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and set aside the award dated 12.06.2014 passed by the Labour Court, Rajkot in Reference (LCR) No. 126 of 2008, wherein the Labour Court partly allowed the reference with the direction to the employer to reinstate the workman i.e. the present appellant without continuity of service however, without back wages.

2. It is the case of the appellant that he was illegally terminated on 31.03.1999. It is also not in dispute that he raised an industrial dispute with regard to his termination in the year 2008, which culminated into the Reference (LCR) No. 126 of 2008.

3. Before the Labour Court, it was contended that he was working as a Clerk and appointed in the year 1983 and he worked regularly till 31.03.1999. A specific contention was raised by the respondent-State authorities that there has been delay in raising the industrial dispute however, the Labour Court has allowed the reference proceedings by observing that the term

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top