Back
BHARGAV D. KARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
Amrav Babulal Dugar Lh Of Lt. Babulal Manmar Dugar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
Bhargav D. Karia, J.
1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Vaibhavi K. Parikh for the appellant and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Raj Tanna for the respondent State.
2. By this appeal under section 78 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (For short “the VAT Act”), the appellant has proposed the following substantial questions of law arising out of order dated 20.02.2024 passed by Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal, Ahmedabad (For short “the Tribunal”) in Second Appeal No.1023 of 2022:
(ii) Whether in the facts and under the circumstances of the case, the order of Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal is perverse in as much as :
(a) it fails to take into consideration and take proper cognizance of the various documentary evidences placed before it;
(b) it fails in not considering, adjudicating and dealing with the arguments and submissions made by the appellant;
(c) it fails
The court established that the burden of proof lies with the appellant to substantiate claims of tax-free transactions, which was not met in this case.
The court confirmed that sales tax liability requires clear evidence of collection, with the Tribunal correctly stating that merely inclusive pricing does not prove tax collection on exempt goods.
The taxable turnover of a works contractor for the transfer of property involved in the execution of works contract shall be arrived after deducting the value of goods used in the execution of works ....
The burden of proof lies with the dealer to establish the genuineness of transactions and actual movement of goods for Input Tax Credit claims under GST.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of correctly interpreting and applying the provisions of the CST Act, particularly in relation to transit sales and exemptions under....
The court emphasized the presumption of accuracy in accounts maintained during regular business and the requirement for substantial evidence to justify any rejection of those accounts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
