SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2785

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Khan Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Aditya Pandey
For the Respondent: Rishi Kumar ACSC.

Table of Content
1. writ petition challenging gst order. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's arguments on legality of detention. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments from respondents and court's preamble. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. court discussion on evidential requirements. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court's analysis of procedural issues. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. court's assessment of penalty provisions. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
7. final judgment on the legality of the orders. (Para 30 , 31)
8. writ petition succeeds; order set aside. (Para 32 , 33 , 34)

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

Heard Sri Aditya Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar learned ACSC for the respondents.

2. Since the GST Tribunal has not yet been formed the present writ petition is being entertained against the impugned order passed by the Additional Commissioner (Appeals).

3. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 19.8.2021 passed by the respondent no.1 in Appeal No. GST-77/20, Assessment Year 2020-21 under the provisions of Section 129 (3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short 'GST Act") by which the order dated 21.10.2020 p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top