A. S. SUPEHIA, MAUNA M. BHATT
SAURASHTRA SHRAMIK SANGH – Appellant
Versus
AMRELI MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present appeal emanates from the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 29.08.2016 rejecting the writ petition filed by the appellant-Union on behalf of the workman challenging the award dated 29.05.2007 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bhavnagar in Reference (IT) No. 130 of 2003.
2. The appellant-Union submitted that the workman, who was appointed as a Clerk in 1987 raised a demand in 1992 for regularising the service, which culminated into reference proceedings being Reference (IT) No. 130 of 2003. It appears that initially the Tribunal passed an award in favour of the workman however, the Municipality assailed the same before this Court by filing a writ petition being Special Civil Application No. 2779 of 2002 and this Court vide order dated 19.01.2006 remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. Thereafter, the Tribunal has rejected the reference proceedings, which has culminated into the captioned writ petition. The learned Single Judge has rejected the same and hence, this appeal.
3. The sole ground, on which the Industrial Tribunal has rejected the reference proceedings, by holding that there are 34 posts in the set-up of Junior Clerks a
Dalip Singh and Ors. vs. State of Haryana and Ors. 2019 (11) SCC 422
Regional Manager, State Bank of India vs. Raja Ram
Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. 2023 (3) SCC 639
The court established that unequal treatment in employment regularization, despite available posts, constitutes an unfair labor practice under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The obligation of the employer to regularise the service of workmen and the prohibition against unfair labour practices under Section 25T of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.
The court upheld the Tribunal's awards for employee regularization, emphasizing the prohibition of unfair labor practices under the Industrial Disputes Act, while clarifying the need for state approv....
The court upheld the Tribunal's order for regularization of workers, finding the Municipality's prolonged employment practices constituted unfair labor practices under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The court upheld the Tribunal's order for regularization of employees, citing unfair labor practices by the Municipality in retaining them on temporary wages despite available posts.
The obligation of the employer to accommodate the workman, the power of the Labour Court to grant relief, and the legal principles related to unfair labour practices and regularisation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the municipality's actions constituted unfair labor practice, justifying the regularisation of the respondent-workman's service. The court emp....
The court affirmed that failing to regularize employees engaged in continuous work constitutes unfair labor practice under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The obligation of the employer to accommodate and adjust its employees, the prohibition against unfair labor practices under Section 25T of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, and the unfair labor prac....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the employer's failure to fill permanent posts and continuing to employ workers on a temporary basis amounts to unfair labour practice, as ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.