Back
BHARGAV D. KARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
NRI Crop Science – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. D.K.Trivedi for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Raj Tanna and Ms. Shrunjal Shah for the respondent-State.
2. By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
B. Your Lordships may be pleased to allow this petition;
C. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ quashing and setting aside letter dated 11/3/2022 (VERA- DISPOSAL LETTER NO. 77722VSDISP018160995)being issued by Respondent no.01 herein, whereby application of the petitioner bearing no. 99KS0035845 under Vera Samadhan Yojna 2019 was disposed;
D. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent No, 01 to immediately restore Application No. 99KS0035845 (date of acknowledgement - 25/01/2020) being filed by the petitioner under Vera Samadhan Yojana, 2019 and directing the Respondent No. 01 to issue Remission Order/Certificate in regard to the said application No. 99KS0035845 under the said
The court established that a taxpayer who has paid the principal tax is entitled to a waiver of interest and penalty under the Amnesty Scheme, regardless of subsequent demands for penalty.
The court established that payment of tax and interest prior to assessment qualifies a taxpayer for the waiver of penalties under the Amnesty Scheme, regardless of subsequent procedural misinterpreta....
Payments made under the Amnesty Scheme are to be treated as deposits and not appropriated under Section 91 of the KVAT Act, allowing for potential refunds of excess payments.
The timely payment of outstanding dues as per the corrected intimation and assessment order entitles the petitioner to the benefits of the Vera Samadhan Yojana-2019, despite discrepancies in the inti....
The court held that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted from the disputed amount before calculating tax waivers, ensuring taxpayers are not penalized for pre-payment.
The court ruled that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted before applying tax waivers, ensuring fair treatment for taxpayers.
The court ruled that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted before applying tax waivers, ensuring fair computation of tax liabilities.
The court clarified that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted from disputed tax before applying waivers, ensuring equitable treatment for taxpayers.
The court ruled that pre-deposits should not be deducted before applying tax waivers under the Settlement Scheme, ensuring taxpayers are not penalized for compliance.
The court ruled that minor delays in tax payments under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act should not preclude benefits intended by the legislation, emphasizing a liberal interpretation of beneficia....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
