HARISANKAR V. MENON
3f Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner(Assessment), Commercial Taxes – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harisankar V. Menon, J.
[WP(C) Nos.17130/2017 and 22262/2020]
These two writ petitions essentially call into question the manner in which certain payments made by the petitioner are to be treated while considering the petitioner's application for Amnesty.
2. The petitioner, an assessee under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, KVAT ‘Act’) claims to be dealing in margarine. There were certain disputes with respect to the tax payable on the sale of margarine by the petitioner within the State of Kerala. While the petitioner took the stand that margarine was taxable only at the rate of 5%, the Department took the stand that the same is assessable at the higher rate of 12.5% /13.5% / 14.5%. Assessments were also finalized accordingly for the various assessment years at the higher rates as above. The assessments at the higher rate were questioned before this Court and the matter stood decided against the petitioner by Ext.P5 judgment produced in W.P(C) No.17130 of 2017. The said judgment stood confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court, on account of which, the petitioner filed Special Leave Petitions before the Apex Court. When coercive steps were t
Modern Hotel v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another (2016) 15 SCC 620
Hemalatha Gargya v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Union of India and Others v. NITDIP Textiles Processors Private Limited and Another (2012) 1 SCC 226
Payments made under the Amnesty Scheme are to be treated as deposits and not appropriated under Section 91 of the KVAT Act, allowing for potential refunds of excess payments.
The court established that payment of tax and interest prior to assessment qualifies a taxpayer for the waiver of penalties under the Amnesty Scheme, regardless of subsequent procedural misinterpreta....
The court established that a taxpayer who has paid the principal tax is entitled to a waiver of interest and penalty under the Amnesty Scheme, regardless of subsequent demands for penalty.
The Amnesty Scheme does not allow the adjustment of any amount due to an assessee, and the authority under the Amnesty Scheme becomes functus officio once an order is passed and cannot modify the ord....
The court held that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted from the disputed amount before calculating tax waivers, ensuring taxpayers are not penalized for pre-payment.
The court established that the words 'arrears of tax' in the Amnesty Scheme do not include amounts subject to an appeal filed by the State and pending consideration, and the assessees are bound to co....
The court ruled that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted before applying tax waivers, ensuring fair computation of tax liabilities.
The court ruled that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted before applying tax waivers, ensuring fair treatment for taxpayers.
The court clarified that under the Settlement Scheme, pre-deposits should not be deducted from disputed tax before applying waivers, ensuring equitable treatment for taxpayers.
The court ruled that pre-deposits should not be deducted before applying tax waivers under the Settlement Scheme, ensuring taxpayers are not penalized for compliance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.