IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
Dipsang Mangaji Makwana & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Anr. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No.7440 of 2017
Decided on : 03-07-2024
Regularization - Employment - Government Resolution 17.10.1988 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988, emphasizing that daily wage workers with over five years of service are entitled to benefits, irrespective of the 240 days work requirement, influencing the decision to grant regularization.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, skilled daily wagers in the horticultural department, sought regularization of their services based on a government resolution and previous court rulings, after facing termination and subsequent reinstatement.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners had served for over 21 years and were entitled to benefits under the government resolution, rejecting the argument that they did not meet the 240 days work requirement.
Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularization and benefits under the government resolution despite not having worked 240 days in a year.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the benefits of the government resolution apply to daily wage workers with over five years of service, regardless of the 240 days work condition, as established in prior judgments.
Result: The petition is allowed, directing the respondents to grant benefits under the government resolution to the petitioners.
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Yatin Soni, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners and Ms. Pooja Ashar, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents-State.
2. By way of the present petition, petitioners herein seek directions upon the respondent authorities to regularize the services of the petitioners following the length of service of the petitioners as per the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of State of Gujarat & Ors. v/s. PWD Employees Union & Ors. ETC. reported in 2013(8) Scale 579, which is duly produced at Page-61.
3. In light of the aforesaid position of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court, the order passed in Special Civil Application No. 11297 of 2016 dated 02.08.2016 and duly confirmed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 1268 of 2017 vide order dated 18.06.2018, whereby, the directions were issued to consider the case of the petitioners, in accordance with the government resolution dated 17.10.1988 and it was also further directed that such benefits could not be denied to the petitioners only on the ground that the petitioners have not worked 240 days. The petitioners herein also seek parity with the order passed in Special Civil Application No. 1563 of 1992 and allied matters, wherein, order dated 31.01.2013 came to be passed, following the ratio as laid down in the aforesaid Letters Patent Appeal and the Hon’ble Apex Court as referred above.
4. The petitioners herein are constrained to approach this Court once again, this being a 3rd round of litigation seeking regularization of the services, in light of the government resolution dated 17.10.1988 and the position of law as referred above and have prayed for the following reliefs:
(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to direct the respondent to regularize the services of the petitioners from retrospective effect from 1992 on the basis of G.R. dated 17/10/1988 on the basis of the length of services of the petitioners as mentioned in the said G.R.;
(C) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to the respondents to grant the benefits of Govt. Resolution dtd. 17.10.1988 to the petitioner, following the length of service of the petitioners and also as per the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition;
(D) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to direct the respondent authority to pay the difference of salary as per the prevailing pay commission from the date of joining their respective service, as the services of the petitioners are eligible for benefit of Govt. resolution dtd. 17.10.1988, on completing 10 years of continuous service of each petitioner, along with interest in the interest of justice;
(E) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to direct the respondent authority to pay the difference of salary as per the prevailing pay commission from the date of joining their respective service, as the services of the petitioner are eligible for benefit of Govt. Resolution dtd. 17.10.1988, on completing 10 years of continuous service of each petitioner, along with interest in the interest of justice, pending the admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition;
(F) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to quash and set aside the said decision of the Director of Horticulture Department of the State of Gujarat conveyed to the petitioner by communication BGT/ KHNG /KH - Court Case/ 490-91-17 dated 17th January, 2017 and further be pleased to declare the same to be unjust, arbitrary and illegal.
(G) Pending hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondent not to terminate the services of the petitioners and further direct the respondent to continue to give work for more than 240 days in a year
Bharatiya Seva Samaj Trust versus Yogeshbhai Ambalal Patel and Another reported in (2012) 9 SCC 310
Raghavendra Rao and Others versus State of Karnataka and Others reported in (2009) 4 SCC 635
State of Gujarat & Ors. v/s. PWD Employees Union & Ors. ETC. reported in 2013(8) Scale 579
State of Gujarat vs. P.W.D. Employees Union [2013 (8) SCALE 579]
Daily wage workers with over five years of service are entitled to benefits under the government resolution, irrespective of the 240 days work requirement.
The court established that continuity of service recognized by a Labour Court must be considered for granting benefits under government resolutions for daily wage workers.
The court established that continuity of service recognized by the Labour Court is essential for granting benefits under government resolutions for daily wage workers.
A piece-rate worker is entitled to the same benefits as daily wagers under Government Resolution 17.10.1988, highlighting the necessity of equitable treatment in employment rights.
The Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 applies to all departments in the State of Gujarat, and the concerned respondent authority is directed to pay all consequential benefits to the petitioner w....
Labour Law – Daily wager worker - Grant of pay revision - Daily wage workers and semi skilled who have completed more than 15 years of their service will get one increment, two increments for 20 year....
Piece-rate workers are entitled to benefits under the Government Resolution 17.10.1988 as they fall within the definition of wages under the Industrial Disputes Act.
All those persons who would be entitled to regularisation/permanent status prior to April 01, 2005 shall be given the benefit of earlier scheme i.e. GPF. However, those who attain this status after A....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.