Back
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Ghelabhai Vajabhai Satiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.) :
1. By way of present petition, the petitioner herein has prayed for the following reliefs :
B. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent authorities to extend the benefits as contained in Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988, as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 09.07.2013 (reported in 2013 (8) Scale 579) to the petitioner from the date
Piece-rate workers are entitled to benefits under the Government Resolution 17.10.1988 as they fall within the definition of wages under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Employees completing a specific number of years are entitled to benefits of permanency and are to be treated at par with regularly appointed employees. Additionally, piece rated workers are entitled ....
A piece-rate worker is entitled to the same benefits as daily wagers under Government Resolution 17.10.1988, highlighting the necessity of equitable treatment in employment rights.
The Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 applies to all departments in the State of Gujarat, and the concerned respondent authority is directed to pay all consequential benefits to the petitioner w....
The court established that continuity of service recognized by a Labour Court must be considered for granting benefits under government resolutions for daily wage workers.
Daily wage workers with over five years of service are entitled to benefits under the government resolution, irrespective of the 240 days work requirement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
