Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
Veenaben V. Pandya - Petitioner
Versus
Krushnakantbhai Joshi & Ors. - Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 12036 of 2007 With R/Special Civil Application No. 17206 of 2007
Decided On : 07-08-2024
Employment - Teacher's Salary - Bombay Primary Education Act - Sections Referenced: 9, 13(D) - The court interpreted the provisions regarding teacher appointments and salary entitlements, concluding that the petitioner was not entitled to the government pay scale due to lack of formal appointment, thus influencing the decision to deny her claims for back wages.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a teacher, challenged the Tribunal's order denying her salary differences for the periods 1987-1995 and 1998-2003, claiming she was entitled to a government pay scale despite being appointed on a fixed salary without formal appointment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was not formally appointed and had accepted a fixed salary for years without raising objections, thus ruling that she was not entitled to the government pay scale.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the government pay scale and allowances as a trained teacher despite her informal appointment status.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that without formal appointment and consistent acceptance of a lower salary, the petitioner could not claim entitlement to the government pay scale.
Result: The court dismissed the petitioner's claims for back wages and upheld the Tribunal's order regarding her salary.
JUDGMENT :
Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.
1. Heard Ms. Mamta, Vyas, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. N.D. Gohil, the learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.1.
2. Both the petitions challenge the judgment and order 22.8.2006 passed by the learned Member of Gujarat Primary Education Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Application No.59 of 1998.
3. In the Special Civil Application No.12036 of 2007 the subject matter of challenge is to the extent that the petitioner’s application praying for the difference of wages including medical allowance for the period from 1987 to 1995 and 1998 to 21.7.2003 came to be rejected. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-
(B) The Hon'ble Court be pleased to hold that the respondent school had committed willful breach of the interim order of Tribunal dated 30-4-1998 and be pleased to pass consequential orders.
(C) During the pendency and final disposal of this petition, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent school to deposit the amount payable to the petitioner for the period 1987 to 1995 before this Hon'ble Court and with further direction to make payment of difference of salary for the period 1995 to 2003 immediately with running interest of 12% from the date of order till the date of payment is made.
(D) The Hon'ble Court be please to award the costs of this petition.
(E) Any other and further relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper to meet the ends of justice.”
4. In the Special Civil Application No.17206 of 2007 the subject matter of challenge is to the extent that the respondent being an honorary teacher according to her own written admission dated 2.3.1998 the Tribunal did not believe it because there is no provision of honorary teacher in the Primary Education Act. The petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-
(B) To declare that the respondent No.1 has used mal practice in producing zerox as well as original documents which is not supposed to be in her custody.
(B1) During the pendency of this petition the judgment of the Tribunal be stayed.
(C) The Hon'ble court be pleased award the cost to this petition.
(D) Any other & further relief which this Hon'ble court may deem just & proper to meet the ends of justice.”
5. The facts as stated in the Special Civil Application No.12036 of 2007 is taken as lead matter and the facts stated in the said petition, being common in both the petitions read thus for sake of convenience :-
5.1 The petitioner of the Special Civil Application No.12036 of 2007 was an employee of the respondent No.1 School (petitioner of Special Civil Application No.17206 of 2007), possessing Educational Qualification of S.S.C. Diploma of Education, (D. Ed.), which is equivalent to P.T.C. The said petitioner applied for the post of Primary Teacher in response to an advertisement dated on 4.6.1987 and respondent No.1 Trust after taking interview selected and appointed the petitioner as Primary Teacher of the respondent No.2 School with effect from 15.6.1987. At the time of joining the service, the petitioner was given a fixed salary of Rs.400/- and every year increase of Rs.100/- was given to the pet
A teacher's entitlement to government pay scales requires formal appointment; informal or honorary status negates such claims.
Point of Law - In view of the above provisions of the Act, 1972 it emerges that due to fault of the management of the School the petitioner cannot be penalized by not granting the protection under Se....
Service Matter1 - Under Section 106 of the Schedule “F”, it is nowhere provided that if the appointment of Teacher is made in Non Granted School, then Teacher cannot be given an appointment in the gr....
The court clarified the employment status of the petitioner and directed verification of salary arrears computation, emphasizing the need for proper documentation.
The court held that a petitioner selected prior to a government resolution is entitled to regular pay-scale instead of a fixed salary, quashing the tribunal's contrary decision.
Continuous service obligates salary payment despite appointment legality, and equal treatment demands non-discriminatory enforcement of employment rights.
The Petitioner is entitled to backwages and benefits from 17.01.1998 to 04.02.2010 due to unjustified non-payment and lack of substantiated misconduct.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
