SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1784

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Ramju @ Ramjan Bhatti – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Yurvaj Brahmbhatt APP
For the Respondent: Mr Pathik M Acharya.

JUDGMENT :

HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.

1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant – State of Gujarat under Section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the impugned judgment and order dated 7.9.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Bhuj (hereinafter be referred to as “the trial Court”) in Sessions Case No. 65 of 2008 whereby the trial Court has acquitted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 306 etc. of the Indian Penal Code (“I.P.C.” for short)

2. Brief facts of the present case, in nutshell, are as under:-

2.1 The complainant Aminaben wife of Ramjan Harun Bhatti, was residing at Kera village and her husband was doing labour work. Aminaben was married with the accused Ramjan Harun Bhatti, 15 years prior to the incident, as per the rite and customs of their community. She was having three sons and one daughter and she was having two sisters. Her husband was doing labour work, sometime he did not go to labour work and did not get sufficient money hence, quarrel took place between the complainant and her husband very often. Therefore, the complainant informed at her parental home to her brothers

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top