HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DILIPBHAI BHIMJIBHAI SARVAIYA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant-State of Gujarat under Section 378(1)(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the impugned judgment and order dated 30.04.2010 passed by the learned Presiding Officer and Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Fast Track Court, Rajkot (hereinafter be referred to as “the trial Court”) in Sessions Case No. 105 of 2006 whereby the trial Court has acquitted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 306, 114 etc of the Indian Penal Code whereby the trial Court has acquitted the accused for the alleged offence.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
2. It is the case of the prosecution that one Nitaben daughter of the complainant, prior to performing marriage with accused No. 1, was married with one Ashokbhai Zaverbhai Solanki resident of Ahmedabad, however, they were separated within six months and after a period of ten years, Nitaben married with accused No. 1. It is also the case of the prosecution that after the marriage, Nitaben started residing with accused and when Nitaben came to know about the illicit relation between the accused, the dispute cropped up between them and the accused was giving mental and
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar Vs. State of Karnataka
Chandrappa and others Vs. State of Karnataka
Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan and another
M. Arjunan v. State Represented by its Inspector of Police
Rajesh Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and another
Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
S.S. Cheena Vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan and Anr. (2010) 12 SCC 190
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC sections related to abetment of suicide.
The court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC Sections 306 and 498-A; clear evidence of instigation is necessary.
The prosecution must provide clear evidence of instigation or connection to establish charges of cruelty and abetment of suicide under IPC; mere allegations are insufficient.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to insufficient evidence of abetment of suicide and cruelty, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof on the prosecu....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in cases of acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for reliable evidence linking alleged cruelty to suicide.
Abetment of suicide – Merely on allegation of harassment without their being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on part of accused which led or compelled the person to commit sui....
The court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment of suicide; clear evidence of intent and coercion is required.
Appeal against acquittal – When two views are possible, judgment and order of acquittal passed by trial Court should not be interfered with by Appellate Court unless for special reasons.
In appeals against acquittal, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment of suicide.
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's conduct amounted to 'cruelty' leading to the victim's suicide, which was not established in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.