Back
BIREN VAISHNAV, MAULIK J. SHELAT
Patel Subodhkumar Prabhubhai – Appellant
Versus
Joshi Janakbhai Jayantilal Deceased Through His Legal Heirs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAULIK J.SHELAT, J.
1. The present appeal is filed under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act (herein after referred to as ‘the MV Act’) by the original opponents against judgement and award dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxilliary), Mahesana in Motor Accident Claim Petition (MACP) No. 4 of 2006. Parties will be referred as per their original status.
2. Short facts:
2.1 On 23.02.2005 one Janakbhai was riding his motorcycle bearing registration No. GJ-5-BL-2864 on Rander Road Surat. At that point of time, one Indica Car bearing registration No. GJ-5-CA-4048 driven by opponent No.1 dashed with rear side of motorcycle.
2.2 The injured claimant Janakbhai has sustained injuries on his head and eyes and upper body parts. The injured claimant was hospitalized for quite long time and ultimately has sustained 85% disability on body as a whole.
2.3 The injured claimant has filed MACP No. 4 of 2006 under Section 166 of the MV Act, through his next friend i.e. Harshadbhai Jayantibhai Joshi, who happens to be the brother of the injured claimant against driver and owner of Indica car for compensation of Rs.50,00,000/-. The summons of claim petition was serve
The Court upheld the Tribunal's award, asserting that failure to contest the claim negates the right to appeal, and future income prospects must be considered in compensation for permanent disability....
The court upheld the principle that compensation must be based on realistic assessments of earning capacity and substantiated claims, rejecting unproven future medical expenses.
It is a matter of record that Tribunal considered permanent disability of the body as a whole to extent of 90% and assessed compensation under head of loss of future income
The standard of proof in motor accident claims is based on the preponderance of probability, and the Tribunal's assessment of negligence and compensation was upheld due to lack of contradictory evide....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the proper consideration of future income and loss of career in determining compensation for motor accident claims.
In cases of permanent disability due to motor accidents, courts must consider proven income, future prospects, and the severity of injuries when determining compensation.
Point of law : As the age of the appellant was 19 years on the date of the accident and as he was self-employed person, the appellant would be entitled to prospective income to the tune of 40%. As th....
The court ruled that future earning potential must be considered when assessing compensation for injured claimants, particularly students, and emphasized the need for adequate compensation for pain a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
