Back
MAULIK J. SHELAT, BIREN VAISHNAV
Riddhi Atulkumar Mewada – Appellant
Versus
Kanubhai Mayabhai Bharwad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAULIK J.SHELAT, J.
1. All these First Appeals are filed by original claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the M. V. Act’) challenging the common judgment and award dated 17.03.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Auxilliary – VII) (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) at Gondal in respective claim petitions.
2. With the joint request of learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, all these appeals are taken up for admission and final hearing.
2.1 Admit. Learned advocate Mr. G. C. Mazmudar waives service of notice of admission for respondent – Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. (insurer of minibus). Learned advocate Ms. Kirti S. Pathak waives service of notice of admission for respondent - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. (insurer of Truck). Presence of other respondents not required for adjudication of appeals as insurance companies are not disputing it's respective liabilities.
2.2 Parties are referred as their original position.
3. Short Facts:
3.1 Short facts of claimants' case are that on 15.02.2012, the deceased Niteshbhai Manilal Mistri with other injured claimants were travelling in M
The court ruled that future earning potential must be considered when assessing compensation for injured claimants, particularly students, and emphasized the need for adequate compensation for pain a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the re-assessment of the claimant's income and future loss of income for the calculation of compensation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's duty to award just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account recent legal developments and the power of the Court ....
The court affirmed the principle of just compensation in motor accident claims, emphasizing the need for adequate assessment of loss of dependency and future prospects based on established income.
The court established that future income loss must account for potential salary increases and accurately reflect the claimant's functional disability.
In cases of permanent disability due to motor accidents, courts must consider proven income, future prospects, and the severity of injuries when determining compensation.
The judgment establishes that compensation for personal injury must reflect actual income, future prospects, and the extent of disability, ensuring just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
