BIREN VAISHNAV, MAULIK J. SHELAT
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Heenaben Khanjanbhai Vora – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAULIK J.SHELAT, J.
1. The present appeal is filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act (herein after referred to as ‘the M.V. Act’) and Cross-Objection filed by original claimants under Order XLI Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code (herein after referred as CPC) challenging judgment and award dated 18.04.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Aux.), Bhavnagar in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.409 of 2015.
2. The parties will be referred as their original position before the tribunal.
3. Short facts of the case appear to be as under;
3.1 That on 10.10.2015 between 8:00 P.M. to 8:30 P.M, the deceased was returning from Ahmedabad to Bhavnagar in the motorcar no. GJ-4-AP-4150, which is of his ownership and he was driving his car slowly and on correct side of the road. When he reached near the place of accident, the opponent no.1 came by driving Truck no. GJ-4-AT-9911 from opposite direction in a rash and negligent manner and in full speed and dashed with the car of the deceased. As a result of this accident, the deceased sustained serious injuries and succumbed to the same.
3.2 As the death of the deceased was due to rash and negligent driv
IFFCO Tokyo General Insurance Company vs. Gita Devi AIR 2023 SC 5545
National Insurance Company Limited Versus Pranay Sethi 2017 (16) SCC 680
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Nanu Ram & Ors. 2018 (18) SCC 130
United India Insurance Co Ltd Versus Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors 2021 (11) SCC 780
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Swaran Singh 2004 (3) SCC 297
Insurance companies must pay compensation to claimants before recovering from vehicle owners when the driver holds a fake license, as established by Supreme Court precedents.
The court ruled that contributory negligence cannot be inferred solely from a site plan when eyewitness testimony indicates no fault, and clarified compensation calculations regarding deductions and ....
The court affirmed that the insurance company is liable for compensation when the driver, even if related to the owner, was covered under the policy, emphasizing the principle of just compensation.
The court ruled that the absence of the truck driver required an inference of sole negligence, overturning the Tribunal's finding of contributory negligence against the deceased.
Motor Accident Claims – Compensation - If amount of interest does not exceeds Rs.50,000/-in any financial year, registry of this Tribunal is directed to allow claimant to withdraw amount without prod....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principle of 'pay and recovery' in directing the Insurance Company to pay the compensation amount to the claimants first and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.