Back
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
B. Govindbhai And Co. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aniruddha P. Mayee, J.
1. The present Special Civil Application is filed praying for the following reliefs:-
(B) The Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, commanding the authorised officer to include the names of the petitioners in the voters list of traders' constituency for the elections of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Unjha and permit the petitioners to cast their votes from the traders constituency in the elections of APMC Unjha.
(C) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the petition, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the authorised officer to permit the petitioners to vote in the traders' constituency for the elections of Agriculture Produce Market Committee Unjha.
Voting rights are statutory and must adhere to legal provisions, requiring proper notice and opportunity before deletion from voters list.
The court emphasized that the inclusion or exclusion of names in the voters' list does not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and should be addressed through an elect....
As competent authority of respondent-Corporation after considering the findings of inquiry report has come to the conclusion to impose the punishment on petitioner of removal from service which does ....
The exclusion or inclusion of names in the voters' list does not warrant interference by the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ-applicant was relegate to avail statutory r....
The court ruled that names cannot be included in the voters' list after the election declaration date, emphasizing the Authorized Officer's duty to act independently and in accordance with the law.
Eligibility for inclusion in the voters' list requires payment of market fees for the current year; failure to comply results in exclusion.
The court upheld the exclusion of petitioners from the voters list for failing to meet statutory eligibility requirements, emphasizing limited judicial intervention in ongoing election processes.
The Court emphasized that the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be exercised when there is a remedy in filing an election petition, and that all election disputes arisin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is maintainable if the order is ultra vires or nullity and/or ex-facie without ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
