HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Dashrathbhai Laxmanbhai Pithya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J.
1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant – State of Gujarat (original complainant) under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31/07/2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dahod (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”) in Sessions Case No.185 of 2006, whereby, the trial court has convicted the respondent No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and ordered to suffer rigorous imprisonment of two years and imposed fine of Rs.5,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, further rigorous imprisonment of six months, whereas, the trial court has acquitted the respondent Nos.2 and 3 for the offence punishable under Section 498(A) of the IPC. The trial court also acquitted the accused – respondents herein for the alleged offence under Sections 306 and 114 of IPC.
1.1 At the outset, it may be noted that the respondent No.2 – Gangaben W/o. Laxmanbhai Mathurbhai Pithaya (original accused No.2), having expired pending the appeal, the appeal stands abated qua the said respondent No.2. Learned advo
Nipun Aneja and Others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.654 of 2017 dated 03/10/2024
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar Vs. State of Karnataka
Chandrappa and others Vs. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of respondents due to insufficient evidence of cruelty and abetment of suicide, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for substa....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in cases of acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for reliable evidence linking alleged cruelty to suicide.
The prosecution must provide clear evidence of instigation or connection to establish charges of cruelty and abetment of suicide under IPC; mere allegations are insufficient.
The court emphasized that mere allegations of harassment are insufficient to establish abetment of suicide; clear evidence of intent and coercion is required.
The presumption of abetment under Section 113A of the Evidence Act does not apply automatically; the prosecution must prove cruelty to establish guilt under Sections 306 and 498A IPC.
Court emphasized the necessity of establishing clear evidence of cruelty to invoke presumption of abetment of suicide under Section 113A of the Evidence Act, reinforcing the presumption of innocence ....
The prosecution failed to establish the elements of abetment and cruelty, leading to the upholding of the trial Court's acquittal.
The appellate court upheld the trial Court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity for compelling evidence to overturn such decisions.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; mere allegations of harassment are insufficient for conviction under IPC sections related to abetment of suicide.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to insufficient evidence of abetment of suicide and cruelty, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof on the prosecu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.