A. Y. KOGJE, SAMIR J. DAVE
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Mahanand @ Rintu Amarnath Misra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(A.Y. KOGJE, J.)
1. The present appeal is preferred by the State against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 27.11.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.11, City Civil & Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Session case No.155 of 1998. By the impugned judgment and order, the Sessions Court acquitted the respondent-accused for offences under Sections 302 and 135(1) of Indian Penal Code.
2. It is the case where on 18.08.1997 at about three O’clock in the noon deceased Vinod, son of Laxmansinh Hazarisinh went to his friend Sureshkumar Rajput @ Shiva’s house. Thereafter at about 6-30 in the evening said Shiva and Vijay Manubhai Prajapati brought Vinod in rickshaw in blood stained condition to his house. On inquiry by his father Laxmansinh Vinod informed that Rintu Mishra has stabbed him near Surelia Estate opposite Jain Milan Society in a quarrel while gambling. Thereafter, Vinod was taken to Manekba hospital by said Laxman Hazarisinh. Shiva and Vijay but as his condition was serious, the compounder of the hospital advised them to take Vinod to L.G.Hopsital so he was to L.G. Hospital where said Vinod died during the treatment.
2.1 Charge, Exh.2 came to be frame
Rajesh Prasad Vs. State of Bihar & Anr. reported in (2022) 3 SCC 471
Chandrappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2007) 4 SCC 415
An acquittal carries a double presumption of innocence, and the appellate court must not disturb findings unless clear error is established.
Murder – Non-examination of Doctor who conducted autopsy on dead body of deceased and who prepared post-mortem report is not fatal to case of prosecution.
principles relating to interference by the High Court in appeals against acquittal are well settled. While the High Court can review the entire evidence and reach its own conclusions, it will not int....
The court relied on oral and documentary evidence to establish the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.
The dying declaration of the deceased was found to be trustworthy and reliable, leading to the appellants' conviction under Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and reliability issues regarding witness testimonies and dying declarations.
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness accounts and a reliable dying declaration, establishing the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Point if Law: Merely because appellate court on re-appreciation and re-evaluation of the evidence is inclined to take a different view, interference with judgment of acquittal is not justified if vie....
The reliability of dying declarations, the importance of consistency in witness statements, and the principle that if two reasonable conclusions are possible based on the evidence, the appellate cour....
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and credibility of eyewitnesses is essential for conviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.