Back
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
RAMSING JESINGBHAI CHAVDA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
1. Present appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by the appellant-State of Gujarat challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 22.12.2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge (Atrocity), Fast Track Court N.1, Dhrangadhra (hereinafter referred to as “the Trial Court” for short) in Special Case No. 25 of 2004 whereby the Trial Court has acquitted the accused from the charges levelled against them.
2. Brief facts of the present case are that on 06.04.2004 at about 12.00 p.m., the accused came to the house of the complainant and knocked the door and, thereafter they forcefully opened the door and entered into the house of the complainant and asked about Parsottambhai, the brother of the complainant. That brother of the complainant i.e. Parsottambhai had taken some loan from the accused and had not returned the same and, therefore, the assailants came to the house of the complainant and assaulted on Parsottambhai by the respective weapons and upon intervention by the complainant and his mother, they have sustained injuries in the scuffle. It is the case of the prosecution that the
The appellate court upheld the presumption of innocence and confirmed the acquittal, stating the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt.
An appellate court must respect acquittals and only intervene if the trial court's judgment is legally erroneous or misinterprets evidence, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court must uphold acquittals unless there is clear error in the trial court's evaluation of evidence, respecting the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court upheld the trial Court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity for compelling evidence to overturn such decisions.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of compelling evidence to overturn such judgments.
The appellate court cannot overturn an acquittal unless it finds clear illegality or perversity in the trial court's judgment, reaffirming the presumption of innocence.
It is settled law that if main grounds on which lower Court has based its order acquitting accused are reasonable and plausible, and same cannot be entirely and effectively be dislodged or demolished....
An appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence after an acquittal and may only intervene if the trial court's decision is perverse or unsupported by credible evidence, emphasizing the h....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
