SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2090

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MAUNA M. BHATT, J.
Ol Of Aryoday Spg. And Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Manger, State Bank Of India & Ors. – Respondents
R/OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT NO. 42 of 2024, In R/OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT NO. 29 of 2023, With R/COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 44 of 2024, In R/OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT NO. 42 of 2024
Decided on : 22-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR DHAWAN M JAYSWAL
For the Respondent: MR BIJU A NAIR, MR DS VASAVADA, MR PATHIK M ACHARYA, MR PRABHAKAR UPADYAY

The Court has discretion under Section 457(1)(c) of the Companies Act to accept higher bids from non-participants in an auction, prioritizing the interests of creditors.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Section 457(1)(c) - Official Liquidator's Report - E-auction conducted for sale of assets of a company in liquidation - Highest bid of Rs. 70,27,52,700/- received, but a higher bid of Rs. 75,00,00,000/- was offered by an intervener - Court permitted inter-se bidding to maximize sale price for creditors - Sale confirmed in favor of the intervener at Rs. 82,00,00,000/-. (Paras 1, 15, 19)

(B) Auction Process - Discretion of the Court - The Court has the discretion to accept the highest bid in the interest of creditors, even from a party that did not participate in the initial auction, provided no fraud or collusion is alleged. (Paras 12, 14)

Facts of the case:
The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking approval for the highest bid received during an e-auction for the assets of a company in liquidation. An intervener sought to participate in the bidding process, offering a higher amount than the highest bid received. The Court allowed inter-se bidding to ensure maximum recovery for creditors.

Findings of Court:
The Court confirmed the sale in favor of the intervener who offered the highest bid of Rs. 82,00,00,000/-, emphasizing the need to maximize returns for creditors. (Paras 15, 19)

Issues: The main issues were whether the Court could allow a higher bid from a party that did not participate in the initial auction and the discretion of the Court in confirming sales in liquidation proceedings. (Paras 12, 14)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that it has the discretion to accept higher bids to protect the interests of creditors, and that prior participation in the auction is not a prerequisite for consideration of a higher bid. (Paras 12, 14)

Result: Application allowed; sale confirmed in favor of the intervener.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr.Dhawan M Jayswal for applicant no.1 - Official Liquidator, learned advocate Mr.D.S. Vasavada for respondent No.2, learned advocate Mr.Pathik M Acharya for respondent No.3 and learned advocate Mr.Prabhakar Upadhya for respondent No.4. None appeared for respondent No.1 though Notice was served by direct service.

Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr.Devang Nanavati with learned advocate Mr.Saurabh M Patel for the applicant of Company Application No.44 of 2024.

1. The Official Liquidator filed Official Liquidator’s Report No.42 of 2024 seeking following orders and directions from this Hon’ble Court:--

    (A) In view of facts stated here-in-above, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to consider the bid received for Lot No. (III) from M/s. Arham Developers of Rs.70,27,52,700/- as per e-auction conducted by M/ s. RailTel Corporation of India Ltd., as per terms and conditions of sale and/or such other and further terms and conditions as may be considered appropriate by this Hon’ble Court in the matter.

    (B) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Official Liquidator to make payment of bill of Rs.2,36,387/-, to M/s.Global Network Advertising., Advertising Agency, as per advertisement agency’s bill dated 26.06.2024 at Annexure – “B” to this report being the advertisement expenses from the Common Pool Account maintained by the Office of the Official Liquidator subject to recovery from the Sale Consideration on priority basis being Liquidation Expenses.

    (C) As stated in para (9) here-in-above, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct successful bidder to pay cost of Rs.30,000/- + applicable GST to e-auction agency, if the sale is confirmed in their favour, otherwise Official Liquidator may be permitted to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- + applicable GST to e-auction agency if the auction fails and sale is not confirmed in favour of successful bidder from the Common Pool Account maintained by the Official Liquidator.

    (D) Such other and further orders and directions as may be considered just and appropriate may also be passed.”

2. During pendency of the aforesaid report, M/s. Devbhoomi Agrifresh Private Limited, intervener bidder, preferred COMA No.44 of 2024, wherein, applicant seeks following reliefs:

    “This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit present Applicant to participate and allow to bid for the properties into the custody of official liquidator of ARYODAY SPG. & WVG. MILLS COMPANY LTD (In liquidation) as describe in sale proclamation and public notice issued by official liquidator on 20.06.2024 pursuant to this Hon'ble court’s order dated 14.06.2024. This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to order for manual auction by conducting inter-se biding for fetching highest price of the properties into the custody of official liquidator of ARYODAYA SPG. & WVG. MILLS COMPANY LTD (In liquidation) as describe in sale proclamation and public notice issued by official liquidator on 20.06.2024 pursuant to this Hon'ble court’s order dated 14.06.2024 and further this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the present Applicant to participate in the inter-se bidding. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass such further and other orders as the nature and circumstances of the case may require;”

3. This Court vide its order dated 14.06.2024 passed in Official Liquidators Report No.29 of 2024 had permitted Respondent No. 1 to sell the property of ARYODAY SPG AND WEVG. MILLS LTD (in liquidation) and in compliance to the said order, sale proclamation was published on 26.06.2024. Thereafter, accordingly E-auction was conducted on 15.07.2024 wherein two bidders deposited EMD (Earnest Money Deposit) amount of Rs. 7,00,00,000/- as per terms and condition of sale and participated in e-auction proceedings wherein present respondent no. 3 immerged as the highest bidder & respondent No.4 immerged as the second highest bidder respectively. Pursuant to conclusion of said E-auction, R/Official Liquidators Report No. 42 of 2024 has been filed by official liquida

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top