IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MAUNA M. BHATT, J.
Ol Of Aryoday Spg. And Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Manger, State Bank Of India & Ors. – Respondents
R/OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT NO. 42 of 2024, In R/OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT NO. 29 of 2023, With R/COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 44 of 2024, In R/OFFICIAL LIQUDATOR REPORT NO. 42 of 2024
Decided on : 22-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr.Dhawan M Jayswal for applicant no.1 - Official Liquidator, learned advocate Mr.D.S. Vasavada for respondent No.2, learned advocate Mr.Pathik M Acharya for respondent No.3 and learned advocate Mr.Prabhakar Upadhya for respondent No.4. None appeared for respondent No.1 though Notice was served by direct service.
Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr.Devang Nanavati with learned advocate Mr.Saurabh M Patel for the applicant of Company Application No.44 of 2024.
1. The Official Liquidator filed Official Liquidator’s Report No.42 of 2024 seeking following orders and directions from this Hon’ble Court:--
(B) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Official Liquidator to make payment of bill of Rs.2,36,387/-, to M/s.Global Network Advertising., Advertising Agency, as per advertisement agency’s bill dated 26.06.2024 at Annexure – “B” to this report being the advertisement expenses from the Common Pool Account maintained by the Office of the Official Liquidator subject to recovery from the Sale Consideration on priority basis being Liquidation Expenses.
(C) As stated in para (9) here-in-above, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct successful bidder to pay cost of Rs.30,000/- + applicable GST to e-auction agency, if the sale is confirmed in their favour, otherwise Official Liquidator may be permitted to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- + applicable GST to e-auction agency if the auction fails and sale is not confirmed in favour of successful bidder from the Common Pool Account maintained by the Official Liquidator.
(D) Such other and further orders and directions as may be considered just and appropriate may also be passed.”
2. During pendency of the aforesaid report, M/s. Devbhoomi Agrifresh Private Limited, intervener bidder, preferred COMA No.44 of 2024, wherein, applicant seeks following reliefs:
3. This Court vide its order dated 14.06.2024 passed in Official Liquidators Report No.29 of 2024 had permitted Respondent No. 1 to sell the property of ARYODAY SPG AND WEVG. MILLS LTD (in liquidation) and in compliance to the said order, sale proclamation was published on 26.06.2024. Thereafter, accordingly E-auction was conducted on 15.07.2024 wherein two bidders deposited EMD (Earnest Money Deposit) amount of Rs. 7,00,00,000/- as per terms and condition of sale and participated in e-auction proceedings wherein present respondent no. 3 immerged as the highest bidder & respondent No.4 immerged as the second highest bidder respectively. Pursuant to conclusion of said E-auction, R/Official Liquidators Report No. 42 of 2024 has been filed by official liquida
Divya Manufacturing Company (P) Ltd Vs Union Bank of Inda & Ors (2000) 6 SCC 69
Eva Agro feeds Pvt Ltd V/S Punjab National Bank & Others reported in (2023) 10 SCC 189
Manoj I Naik and Associates Vs. Official Liquidator (2015) 3 SCC 112.
The Court has discretion under Section 457(1)(c) of the Companies Act to accept higher bids from non-participants in an auction, prioritizing the interests of creditors.
The highest offer received in the public auction should be accepted as a fair value unless there are allegations of fraud, collusion, etc.
A highest bidder in public auction cannot have a right to get the property or any privilege, unless the authority confirms the auction sale, being fully satisfied that the property has fetched the ap....
An auction conducted by a liquidator is valid unless substantive financial prejudice is demonstrated; post-auction higher bids do not justify reopening concluded proceedings.
Purpose of auction (open or close format) is to get the most remunerative price and giving opportunity to intending bidders to participate and fetch higher realizable value of property – If that path....
Liquidator's cancellation of auction for non-payment within 90 days and EMD forfeiture upheld per regulations; excess deposit beyond EMD refunded with interest to prevent unjust enrichment upon re-au....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.