S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Porsche Father in Swap Case
11 Mar 2026
Natural Gas Supplies Prioritized Under Section 3 Essential Commodities Act Amid LNG Disruptions: Central Govt Order
11 Mar 2026
Delhi High Court Directs Ministries, CBFC to Implement Film Accessibility Features for Disabled Persons per RPWD Act Guidelines
11 Mar 2026
Foreign Nationals Entitled to Article 22(1) Grounds of Arrest in Known Language: Karnataka HC Sets at Liberty but Orders Handover to FRRO
11 Mar 2026
Madras HC Permits CBSE Student to Appear for Maths as Additional Subject Despite Policy Violation in Peculiar 'Rat Race' Circumstances
11 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Neha Rathore
11 Mar 2026
Menaka Guruswamy Elected India's First Openly Queer Rajya Sabha MP
11 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Indore Vikas Praadhikaran (Ida) – Appellant
Versus
Humud Jain Samaj Trust – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
Satish Chandra Sharma, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This present petition is arising out of order dated 08.02.2022 passed in Writ Appeal No. 5/2022, titled as, “Shri Humad Jain Samaj Trust Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.”, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore. The Division Bench of the High Court has set aside the order dated 17.12.2021, passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 26040/2021.
3. The facts of the case reveal that the appellant Indore Vikas Praadhikaran (IDA), hereinafter referred to as “IDA” issued an advertisement inviting bids for leasing out land admeasuring 3382 sq. meters situated at Scheme No. 74-C, Sector C, Indore, on 17.07.2020 and the terms and conditions were specified in the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT). The reserve price was fixed at Rs. 21,120/- per square meter. The IDA pursuant to the NIT dated 17.07.2020 received three bids and the bid of respondent No. 1- Shri Humud Jain Samaj Trust was the highest as a bid of Rs. 25,671.90/- per square meter was offered in the matter. The
No vested right is established from bid submission; rejection of bid is valid when corporation ensures public interest and current market rates prevail.
The highest bidder does not have an indefeasible right without acceptance of the bid and issuance of an allotment letter. The refusal of the bid must be free from arbitrariness or favoritism, and the....
(1) Allotment of Industrial Plot – Ordinarily, when large areas of industrial land are auctioned, overall price would be separately assessed as compared to smaller plots – Merely because selling pric....
The principle that the highest bid does not guarantee acceptance in tender processes, and the authority's discretion must be exercised based on relevant commercial considerations and adherence to pro....
The highest bidder in an auction does not have a vested right, and the authority has the discretion to cancel bids in the interest of public revenue.
The government has the right to change its policy and reject the highest bid for valid reasons, and the decision-making process should be fair and not influenced by malafides or extraneous considerat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article