UMESH A. TRIVEDI, SAMIR J. DAVE
Kiritsinh Jambha Rana – Appellant
Versus
Harpalsinh Ghanshyamsinh Rana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Umesh A. Trivedi, J.)
[1] This Petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner herein, who was respondent in the Election Petition No.1 of 2022, challenging the decision dated 06.02.2023 rendered by Principal Civil Judge, Lakhtar, whereby he allowed the same directing to cancel two votes cast by Manharsinh Nagubha Rana, Voter No.40 of Ward No.4 and Khumansinh Nagubha Zala, Voter No.64 of Ward No.6, on the ground that though they were issued postal ballot papers and in view of Rule 25 of the Gujarat Panchayat Election Rules 1994 (for short “the Rules”), they were prohibited to vote in any other manner except postal ballot, they have cast their vote at the polling station and thereafter cancelling those votes as identified by counterfoil Nos.00294 and 00311, votes received through postal ballot as also found from the ballot boxes, recounted and thereafter result be declared.
[2] The petitioner is the original respondent who was declared elected Sarpanch of Modhvana Gram Panchayat by the Returning Officer, as on counting of votes, both the candidates i.e. petitioner as also respondent herein, found to have obtained equal votes,
Voting integrity is paramount; voters on election duty must cast postal ballots only, affirming election rules and processes.
The right to vote during election is strictly governed by election rules, prohibiting voters on election duty from voting at polling stations to maintain electoral integrity.
The Election Tribunal's order for recounting was justified due to the Election Officer's failure to follow statutory procedures, affecting the election result.
The finality of the electoral roll and the inability to challenge its validity in an election petition.
The validity of the elections must be tested in election petitions under Section 176(5) of the 1994 Act.
Election petitions must demonstrate a prima facie case of irregularities for recounting of votes; non-framing of issues does not invalidate proceedings if parties understand the disputes.
The secrecy of the ballot is sacrosanct, and a recount of votes should only be ordered based on specific and proven allegations, following the prescribed procedure.
An election petition must contain a concise statement of material facts to demonstrate grounds under the Representation of People Act; failure to do so results in dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.