SANDEEP V. MARNE
Ravindra Dattaram Waikar – Appellant
Versus
Ravindra Dattaram Waikar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Sandeep V. Marne, J.)
1) Respondent No.1 in the Election Petition, who is the Returned Candidate, has filed Application (L) No. 29930 of 2024 seeking rejection of the Election Petition under provisions of Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( Code ). Respondent No.1 has also filed Application (L) No.29880 of 2024 for striking of various paragraphs pleaded by the Petitioner in the Election Petition under Order VI Rule 16 of the Code.
2) The Election Petition seeks declaration of election of Respondent No.1 to the 18th Lok Sabha from 27 Mumbai North-West Constituency as void under provisions of Section 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of Representation of People Act, 1951 ( RP Act). The Election Petition further seeks a declaration that the Petitioner is duly elected to the 18th Lok Sabha from 27 Mumbai North-West Constituency under Section 84 read with Section 101(a) of the RP Act.
3) Brief facts leading to filing of the Election Petition are that the Election Commission announced the schedule for 2024 General Elections to the 18th Lok Sabha on 16 March 2024, which were to be conducted in seven phases. So far as election for 27-Mumbai North-West Constituency is co
Rahim Khan v. Khurshid Ahmed (1974) 2 SCC 660
Arikala Narsana Reddy Versus. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari and another
Ashraf Kokkur Versus. K.V. Abdul Khader and others
D. Ramachandran v. R.V. Janakiraman (1999) 3 SCC 267
Dharmin Bai Kashyap Versus. Babli Sahu and others
Durai Muthuswami v. N. Nachiappan
Durai Muthuswami Versus. N Nachiappan
G.M. Siddeshwar Versus. Prasanna Kumar
Jumuna Prasad Mukhariya v. Lachhi Ram (1954) 2 SCC 306:(1955) 1 SCR 608:AIR 1954 SC 686
Jyoti Basu and others Versus. Debi Ghosal and others
Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao (1982) 1 SCC 442
L.R. Shivaramagowda v. T.M. Chandrashekar (1999) SCC 666
Lakshmi Raman Acharya v. Chandan Singh (1977) 1 SCC 423:(1977) 2 SCR 412
M. Narayana Rao v. G. Venkata Reddy (1977) 1 SCC 771:(1977) 1 SCR 490
Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju Versus. Peddireddigari Ramchandra Reddy and others
Mairembam Prithviraj alias Prithviraj Singh Versus. Pukhrem Sharatchandra Singh
Mangani Lal Mandal Versus. Bishnu Deo Bhandari
Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh (1973) 2 SCC 599: (1974) 1 SCR 52
Mohan Singh v. Bhanwarlal (1964) 5 SCR 12:AIR 1964 SC 1366
Mohd. Akbar Versus. Ashok Shahu and others
Ponnala Lakshmaiah Versus. Kommuri Pratap Reddy and others
Rakesh Kumar Versus. Sunil Kumar
Ram Sharan Yadav v. Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh (1984) 4 SCC 649
Ram Sukh Versus. Dinesh Aggarwal
Ramji Prasad Singh v. Ram Bilas Jha (1977) 1 SCC 260
Sardar Harcharan Singh Brar Versus. Sukh Darshan Singh and others
Shambhu Prasad Sharma Versus. Charandas Mahant and others
Uma Ballav Rath v. Maheshwar Mohanty (1999) 3 SCC 357
Umesh Challiyill Versus. K.P. Rajendran
Uttamrao Shivdas Jankar Versus. Ranjitsinh Vijaysinh Mohite Patil
An election petition must contain a concise statement of material facts to demonstrate grounds under the Representation of People Act; failure to do so results in dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 of....
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
Election petitions must plead concise material facts under Section 83(1)(a) RP Act to disclose cause of action; deficient, vague pleadings warrant dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
An election petition must contain concise material facts and particulars as per the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951; failure to do so results in dismissal.
As per provision of Section 31 of Registration of People Act, 1951 and Rule 2 (1) (g) of Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, the Returning Officer concerned did not published put on notice board for pub....
An election petition may be rejected if it fails to comply with mandatory pleading requirements regarding concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices as per the Represen....
Election petitions must include precise material facts to establish a cause of action; failure to do so warrants dismissal per statutory requirements.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.